Talk:Lakota: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
restored unintentionally(?) partially blanked section title |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== |
== the republic a micronation? == |
||
The article micronation defines them as "differ[ing] from secession and self-determination movements in that they are largely viewed as being eccentric and ephemeral in nature". I think by definition the Lakotah Republic is a secession/self-determination movement, and therefore ''not'' a micronation. --[[Special:Contributions/86.137.156.17|86.137.156.17]] ([[User talk:86.137.156.17|talk]]) 20:25, 1 January 2008 (UTC) |
The article micronation defines them as "differ[ing] from secession and self-determination movements in that they are largely viewed as being eccentric and ephemeral in nature". I think by definition the Lakotah Republic is a secession/self-determination movement, and therefore ''not'' a micronation. --[[Special:Contributions/86.137.156.17|86.137.156.17]] ([[User talk:86.137.156.17|talk]]) 20:25, 1 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 17:26, 2 January 2008
the republic a micronation?
The article micronation defines them as "differ[ing] from secession and self-determination movements in that they are largely viewed as being eccentric and ephemeral in nature". I think by definition the Lakotah Republic is a secession/self-determination movement, and therefore not a micronation. --86.137.156.17 (talk) 20:25, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- If you read further on micronations, it talks about the number of people who are part of it and that when it is a small number, say 4 activists, it should be considered a micronation, not a country. See Principality of Sealand as an example -- (Shocktm | Talk | contribs.) 20:38, 1 January 2008 (UTC)