Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Postbeat Poets: Difference between revisions
→Postbeat Poets: keep |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*'''Delete'''. OR essay not grounded in sources. There is no set definition of "post-beat" -- some of the most prominent uses have been for people like Bob Dylan and Patti Smith but the article glosses over this. There is now a self-defined "community" using the terminology but this seems to use in-universe descriptions. This would have to be substantially rewritten to be encyclopedic. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 19:07, 4 January 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. OR essay not grounded in sources. There is no set definition of "post-beat" -- some of the most prominent uses have been for people like Bob Dylan and Patti Smith but the article glosses over this. There is now a self-defined "community" using the terminology but this seems to use in-universe descriptions. This would have to be substantially rewritten to be encyclopedic. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 19:07, 4 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' - I think we should [[WP:CHANCE|give this article a chance]]. I think it needs a good cleanup and possibly a few more references to make it meet Wikipedia's [[WP:NOTABLE|notability criteria]]. If the article hasn't been improved in a month or two, I would recommend renominating it here. [[User:D.M.N.|D.M.N.]] ([[User talk:D.M.N.|talk]]) 21:17, 4 January 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' - I think we should [[WP:CHANCE|give this article a chance]]. I think it needs a good cleanup and possibly a few more references to make it meet Wikipedia's [[WP:NOTABLE|notability criteria]]. If the article hasn't been improved in a month or two, I would recommend renominating it here. [[User:D.M.N.|D.M.N.]] ([[User talk:D.M.N.|talk]]) 21:17, 4 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
I'm still working on it...just please don't delete it. you deleted my first attempt without giving me a chance to remedy the problems and this is a lot of work for a newbee. I'm taking out the opinion and hunting for more links. |
|||
Revision as of 21:43, 4 January 2008
Postbeat Poets
- Postbeat Poets (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Not sure about this one, never heard of this concept before. It reads like an essay and is completely unsourced, so I'm inclined to think it violates WP:NOR, as well as WP:V and possibly WP:N. Google only turns up 40 hits, only one or two are actually related to the topic. Mr Senseless (talk) 18:19, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Article in progress...was gonna finish before I saved but power glitch caused early save(?) Having trouble with refs linking so I manually inserted until I work out bugs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimcohn (talk • contribs) 18:37, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. OR essay not grounded in sources. There is no set definition of "post-beat" -- some of the most prominent uses have been for people like Bob Dylan and Patti Smith but the article glosses over this. There is now a self-defined "community" using the terminology but this seems to use in-universe descriptions. This would have to be substantially rewritten to be encyclopedic. --Dhartung | Talk 19:07, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - I think we should give this article a chance. I think it needs a good cleanup and possibly a few more references to make it meet Wikipedia's notability criteria. If the article hasn't been improved in a month or two, I would recommend renominating it here. D.M.N. (talk) 21:17, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm still working on it...just please don't delete it. you deleted my first attempt without giving me a chance to remedy the problems and this is a lot of work for a newbee. I'm taking out the opinion and hunting for more links.