Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Postbeat Poets: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by Jimcohn - "→Postbeat Poets: " |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I'm still working on it...just please don't delete it. you deleted my first attempt without giving me a chance to remedy the problems and this is a lot of work for a newbee. I'm taking out the opinion and hunting for more links. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jimcohn|Jimcohn]] ([[User talk:Jimcohn|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jimcohn|contribs]]) 21:43, 4 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
I'm still working on it...just please don't delete it. you deleted my first attempt without giving me a chance to remedy the problems and this is a lot of work for a newbee. I'm taking out the opinion and hunting for more links. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jimcohn|Jimcohn]] ([[User talk:Jimcohn|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jimcohn|contribs]]) 21:43, 4 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
Exactly what is the definition of "in-universe descriptions"? |
Revision as of 21:56, 4 January 2008
- Postbeat Poets (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Not sure about this one, never heard of this concept before. It reads like an essay and is completely unsourced, so I'm inclined to think it violates WP:NOR, as well as WP:V and possibly WP:N. Google only turns up 40 hits, only one or two are actually related to the topic. Mr Senseless (talk) 18:19, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Article in progress...was gonna finish before I saved but power glitch caused early save(?) Having trouble with refs linking so I manually inserted until I work out bugs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimcohn (talk • contribs) 18:37, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. OR essay not grounded in sources. There is no set definition of "post-beat" -- some of the most prominent uses have been for people like Bob Dylan and Patti Smith but the article glosses over this. There is now a self-defined "community" using the terminology but this seems to use in-universe descriptions. This would have to be substantially rewritten to be encyclopedic. --Dhartung | Talk 19:07, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - I think we should give this article a chance. I think it needs a good cleanup and possibly a few more references to make it meet Wikipedia's notability criteria. If the article hasn't been improved in a month or two, I would recommend renominating it here. D.M.N. (talk) 21:17, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm still working on it...just please don't delete it. you deleted my first attempt without giving me a chance to remedy the problems and this is a lot of work for a newbee. I'm taking out the opinion and hunting for more links. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimcohn (talk • contribs) 21:43, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Exactly what is the definition of "in-universe descriptions"?