Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Breslin: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::::Having 42000 members on your forums still doesn't make you eligible for inclusion in an encyclopedia, and I see nothing notable about the google search results. Can you actually provide evidence of why this deserves to be here? Has he done anything exceptional? I am abstaining from actually voting until more facts are presented, because I had previously not heard of this man or his internet site/blog, and wish to see if there are reasons to keep the article here. [[User:Kryptops|Kryptops]] 12:28, 11 July 2005 (UTC) |
::::Having 42000 members on your forums still doesn't make you eligible for inclusion in an encyclopedia, and I see nothing notable about the google search results. Can you actually provide evidence of why this deserves to be here? Has he done anything exceptional? I am abstaining from actually voting until more facts are presented, because I had previously not heard of this man or his internet site/blog, and wish to see if there are reasons to keep the article here. [[User:Kryptops|Kryptops]] 12:28, 11 July 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' He is a troll. <small>(''preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment by'' [[Special:Contributions/80.1.241.102|80.1.241.102]] 00:03, 11 July 2005 (UTC))</small> |
*'''Delete''' He is a troll. <small>(''preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment by'' [[Special:Contributions/80.1.241.102|80.1.241.102]] 00:03, 11 July 2005 (UTC))</small> |
||
*'''Strong Speedy Delete''' See [[User:Kryptops|Kryptops]]. --[[User:Weev|Weev]] 12:45, 11 July 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:45, 11 July 2005
non-notable blogger cruft Kryptops 21:28, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
- If it is agreed that this person is not a notable blogger, they should be removed from the Categories: Bloggers section. Apart from that, the article seems valid and I would leave it as is. --Kier Allison 22:16, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
- Is he notable enough to have an article? Running a web site and discussing Quake is not really grounds for having an article in my opinion, but feel free to prove me wrong with some evidence of notability. Kryptops 23:56, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
- Try Googling for Breslin or John Breslin. I clicked on the Boards.ie site and it isn't just a Quake bulletin board: there are hundreds of forums, and at the moment there's over 42000 members registered there. --Kier Allison 04:14, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
- Having 42000 members on your forums still doesn't make you eligible for inclusion in an encyclopedia, and I see nothing notable about the google search results. Can you actually provide evidence of why this deserves to be here? Has he done anything exceptional? I am abstaining from actually voting until more facts are presented, because I had previously not heard of this man or his internet site/blog, and wish to see if there are reasons to keep the article here. Kryptops 12:28, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
- Try Googling for Breslin or John Breslin. I clicked on the Boards.ie site and it isn't just a Quake bulletin board: there are hundreds of forums, and at the moment there's over 42000 members registered there. --Kier Allison 04:14, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
- Is he notable enough to have an article? Running a web site and discussing Quake is not really grounds for having an article in my opinion, but feel free to prove me wrong with some evidence of notability. Kryptops 23:56, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete He is a troll. (preceding unsigned comment by 80.1.241.102 00:03, 11 July 2005 (UTC))
- Strong Speedy Delete See Kryptops. --Weev 12:45, 11 July 2005 (UTC)