Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ars Regendi: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*'''Delete''' - per nom on lack of [[WP:RS]]. Rgds, --[[User:Trident13|Trident13]] ([[User talk:Trident13|talk]]) 02:01, 23 January 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - per nom on lack of [[WP:RS]]. Rgds, --[[User:Trident13|Trident13]] ([[User talk:Trident13|talk]]) 02:01, 23 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
Well, there will come official sources within the next weeks. But, it's hard to understand that you want third party sources (didn't see a browser-based game here which has some) for a easily verifiable facts. I am not talking about a strange thing hidden in my dwelling room - it's online and everybody can take a look at it. --[[User:Malone70|Malone70]] (talk) 23 January 2008 |
|||
Revision as of 09:01, 23 January 2008
An article about a new browser-based games. There aren't enough reliable sources to meet inclusion guidelines or to write an objective article. I searched for reviews (I aim for at least two) or major awards and couldn't find any that weren't user-generated, reprints of press releases, or trivial mentions. Wafulz (talk) 03:38, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom on lack of WP:RS. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 02:01, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Well, there will come official sources within the next weeks. But, it's hard to understand that you want third party sources (didn't see a browser-based game here which has some) for a easily verifiable facts. I am not talking about a strange thing hidden in my dwelling room - it's online and everybody can take a look at it. --Malone70 (talk) 23 January 2008