Talk:Integral humanism (India): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:47, 12 February 2008

India: Politics Start‑class High‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup.

Philosophy: Ethics / Religion Start‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics
	Philosophy of religion

This text was deleted from this page:

- A critique of integral humanism calls it a theory penned in an "ambiguous tone" which lacks clear definitions of the terms used, and lacking to "clearly defining terms". It has also been criticised for using the "common defence (of) evasion", and "sidestepping the main problems facing the author of a new philosophy", apart from not clearing "the air about fundamental questions". This theory quotes passages from the Indian religious text, The Ramayana, The Mahabharata and the Vedas. This critique also says that examples have been "lifted out of context" to claim the "stamp of authority of the sacred texts".

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:08, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Space-filling article.

At no point in this article is it actually explained what the philosophy of "integral humanism" is. The intro and first section describe when, where, and who. The second section describes what it isn't, and allegedly why it's necessary. The third section describes the contents of some membership form, and is totally irrelevant to anything. The fourth section describes a partial history of the BJP party, which is not the topic of this article. The fifth section explains that there was once a French guy who used the same term to mean something else.

This article has no actual content on the stated topic at all. Delete it. --76.217.94.0 (talk) 15:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 == WikiProject class rating==
 This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. [[User:BetacommandBot|BetacommandBot]] 04:08, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
+== Space-filling article. ==
+At no point in this article is it actually explained ''what'' the philosophy of "integral humanism" is. The intro and first section describe ''when'', ''where'', and ''who''. The second section describes what it ''isn't'', and allegedly ''why it's necessary''. The third section describes the contents of some membership form, and is totally irrelevant to anything. The fourth section describes a partial history of the BJP party, which is not the topic of this article. The fifth section explains that there was once a French guy who used the same term to mean something else.
+This article has no actual '''content''' on the stated topic at all. Delete it. --[[Special:Contributions/76.217.94.0|76.217.94.0]] ([[User talk:76.217.94.0|talk]]) 15:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)