Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Anti-Communist propagnda: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Anti-Communist propagnda: oppose |
→Anti-Communist propagnda: absolute disgrace |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*'''Comment'''. Did people really believe that communists will choke you? [[User:Froth|:D\=<]] ([[User talk:Froth|talk]]) 12:24, 27 February 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Comment'''. Did people really believe that communists will choke you? [[User:Froth|:D\=<]] ([[User talk:Froth|talk]]) 12:24, 27 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
**[[American]]s are optimistic. What can I say? :) [[User:Muhammad Mahdi Karim|'''Muhammad''']][[User Talk:Muhammad Mahdi Karim|<small>(''talk'')</small>]] 12:40, 27 February 2008 (UTC) |
**[[American]]s are optimistic. What can I say? :) [[User:Muhammad Mahdi Karim|'''Muhammad''']][[User Talk:Muhammad Mahdi Karim|<small>(''talk'')</small>]] 12:40, 27 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
:*Well, considering that Marxist regimes ([[Hitler]], [[Stalin]], [[Mao Zedong|Mao]], [[Pol Pot]]) were responsible for more than ''100 million'' deaths in the 20th century, I think it's generous that the poster only shows 3, and I think the method of death shown is really humane as opposed to the [[Khmer Rouge|pick axes]] used in Cambodia. -- [[User:Ipankonin|I. Pankonin]] ([[User talk:Ipankonin|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Ipankonin|c]]) 01:35, 28 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose'''. Sorry for being blunt, but this is just part of a POV/POINT spam nomination series by a user that should spend some more time reading WIAFP, checking out the history of previous FPC, and coninue nominating in maybe one month or so. --[[User:Dschwen|Dschwen]] 17:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose'''. Sorry for being blunt, but this is just part of a POV/POINT spam nomination series by a user that should spend some more time reading WIAFP, checking out the history of previous FPC, and coninue nominating in maybe one month or so. --[[User:Dschwen|Dschwen]] 17:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose''' per reasons already given. -- [[User:Grandpafootsoldier|Grandpafootsoldier]] ([[User talk:Grandpafootsoldier|talk]]) 00:54, 28 February 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose''' per reasons already given. -- [[User:Grandpafootsoldier|Grandpafootsoldier]] ([[User talk:Grandpafootsoldier|talk]]) 00:54, 28 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose''' I agree with what the poster says, but it's obviously part of a POV smear campaign. I disagree with the word "supposed" in the caption as well. A better word would be "inevitable". -- [[User:Ipankonin|I. Pankonin]] ([[User talk:Ipankonin|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Ipankonin|c]]) 01:35, 28 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
||
{{-}} |
{{-}} |
Revision as of 01:35, 28 February 2008
Anti-Communist propagnda
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/Is_this_tomorrow.jpg/250px-Is_this_tomorrow.jpg)
- Reason
- Historical image showing anti-Communist propaganda in the US.
- Articles this image appears in
- Propaganda, McCarthyism
- Creator
- Cover to the propaganda comic book "Is This Tomorrow"' published in 1947 by the Catechetical Guild
- Support as nominator Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 08:20, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, fair use copyrighted images don't qualify for featured status. DurovaCharge! 09:28, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy Close per Durova's comments. Muhammad(talk) 11:12, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- Comment. Did people really believe that communists will choke you? :D\=< (talk) 12:24, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- Americans are optimistic. What can I say? :) Muhammad(talk) 12:40, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- Well, considering that Marxist regimes (Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot) were responsible for more than 100 million deaths in the 20th century, I think it's generous that the poster only shows 3, and I think the method of death shown is really humane as opposed to the pick axes used in Cambodia. -- I. Pankonin (t·c) 01:35, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose. Sorry for being blunt, but this is just part of a POV/POINT spam nomination series by a user that should spend some more time reading WIAFP, checking out the history of previous FPC, and coninue nominating in maybe one month or so. --Dschwen 17:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose per reasons already given. -- Grandpafootsoldier (talk) 00:54, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with what the poster says, but it's obviously part of a POV smear campaign. I disagree with the word "supposed" in the caption as well. A better word would be "inevitable". -- I. Pankonin (t·c) 01:35, 28 February 2008 (UTC)