Jump to content

User:David Shankbone/72.76: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Revert to the revision prior to revision 194821224 dated 2008-02-29 03:37:32 by 72.68.112.187 using popups
No edit summary
Line 58: Line 58:
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:David_Shankbone&diff=192870383&oldid=192853230 Pretty soon they're gonna call you tunnel butt, Mavis...or sewer butt, or sewer tunnel butt, especially since you've taken Bregman's decrepit dick up yours.]
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:David_Shankbone&diff=192870383&oldid=192853230 Pretty soon they're gonna call you tunnel butt, Mavis...or sewer butt, or sewer tunnel butt, especially since you've taken Bregman's decrepit dick up yours.]
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Orthodox_Judaism&diff=192737599&oldid=192626963 Right now Shankbone is probably zonked on anti-depressants and/or alcohol, or he's taking it up the ass from Andrei Treivas Bregman, alias Michael Lucas (pornographer) as a reward for the improper edits he's made at Bregman's bio.]
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Orthodox_Judaism&diff=192737599&oldid=192626963 Right now Shankbone is probably zonked on anti-depressants and/or alcohol, or he's taking it up the ass from Andrei Treivas Bregman, alias Michael Lucas (pornographer) as a reward for the improper edits he's made at Bregman's bio.]

==From the person offended by your author photos==

Hi David,

I posted a new comment on the Administrator’s page and it seemed appropriate to post it here, too, but posting the same thing in more than one place seems to be discouraged, so I won’t do it, but please feel free to copy and paste my post here or on your talk page (which I can't access because of the partial block there, I guess), if you think it’s appropriate. Also I just want to say that from what I’ve read, it seems that you’re going through a lot of stress right now, and that sucks, but I’m not the same person as the other people (or person) who’ve been attacking you. I don’t know if that makes it more or less stressful for you. Despite how badly you feel, I’m glad that my post did have some effect on you and made you feel bad to some extent, because I would hate to think you don’t give a shit about what I said. Think about how awful you feel and realize that’s how many of those authors feel whose photos you took. Please try to care about that. I could tell by reading some of your comments that you don’t care if a celebrity is distressed by a photo (I think you gave me that impression when you wrote a post about the actor Mike Farrell. You said something like “Since when do we care that a celebrity isn’t happy we’re not using their airbrushed photo?” Something like that.). I just hope that my post might make you think more and care more about an author’s feelings next time you take a photo of them, post a photo of them, respond to their request that your photo not be used, etc. [[User:Anonymous 374|Anonymous 374]] ([[User talk:Anonymous 374|talk]]) 08:43, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:43, 29 February 2008

Case for Wikipedia action and evidence of libel by IP range based out of Newark, New Jersey.

Pages where this IP range has edit-warred and removed content

A few of the forums

IPs used

BellAtlantic, based in Newark. Illegal activity mentioned below will be brought to their attention through the NetRange: 72.64.0.0 - 72.95.255.255 (abuse@verizon.net)

Second IP range

Also BellAtlantic, also Newark, NJ. NetRange: 71.96.0.0 - 71.127.255.255

Libel

What seems to be at the heart of this:

And the defamation (I don't think this person's rabbi or G-d would approve of what they type)...

From the person offended by your author photos

Hi David,

I posted a new comment on the Administrator’s page and it seemed appropriate to post it here, too, but posting the same thing in more than one place seems to be discouraged, so I won’t do it, but please feel free to copy and paste my post here or on your talk page (which I can't access because of the partial block there, I guess), if you think it’s appropriate. Also I just want to say that from what I’ve read, it seems that you’re going through a lot of stress right now, and that sucks, but I’m not the same person as the other people (or person) who’ve been attacking you. I don’t know if that makes it more or less stressful for you. Despite how badly you feel, I’m glad that my post did have some effect on you and made you feel bad to some extent, because I would hate to think you don’t give a shit about what I said. Think about how awful you feel and realize that’s how many of those authors feel whose photos you took. Please try to care about that. I could tell by reading some of your comments that you don’t care if a celebrity is distressed by a photo (I think you gave me that impression when you wrote a post about the actor Mike Farrell. You said something like “Since when do we care that a celebrity isn’t happy we’re not using their airbrushed photo?” Something like that.). I just hope that my post might make you think more and care more about an author’s feelings next time you take a photo of them, post a photo of them, respond to their request that your photo not be used, etc. Anonymous 374 (talk) 08:43, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:David_Shankbone/72.76&oldid=194858050"