User talk:Cphints1: Difference between revisions
BrucePodger (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Please do not make personal attacks{{#if:Paintboy100| as you did at [[:Paintboy100]]}}. Wikipedia has a strict policy against [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|personal attacks]]. [[Wikipedia:Attack_page|Attack pages]] and images '''are not tolerated''' by Wikipedia and are [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedily deleted]]. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons]] policy, will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. <!-- Template:attack --> [[User:BrucePodger|BrucePodger]] ([[User talk:BrucePodger|talk]]) 02:41, 20 February 2008 (UTC) |
Please do not make personal attacks{{#if:Paintboy100| as you did at [[:Paintboy100]]}}. Wikipedia has a strict policy against [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|personal attacks]]. [[Wikipedia:Attack_page|Attack pages]] and images '''are not tolerated''' by Wikipedia and are [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedily deleted]]. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons]] policy, will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. <!-- Template:attack --> [[User:BrucePodger|BrucePodger]] ([[User talk:BrucePodger|talk]]) 02:41, 20 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
{{unblock|I hadnt read the terms, and the information was true, and i now know the rules. I am very sorry.}} |
Revision as of 04:46, 1 March 2008
Speedy deletion of Cphints1
A tag has been placed on Cphints1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ViperSnake151 02:24, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Notability of Cphints1
A tag has been placed on Cphints1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. B110 communicate (that means talk) 02:30, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yes? What is your hangon reason? B110 communicate (that means talk) 02:33, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- What importance? It is not cited (See WP:CITE), and is not notable. B110 communicate (that means talk) 02:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yes? What is your hangon reason? B110 communicate (that means talk) 02:33, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Cphints1
A tag has been placed on Cphints1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Roleplayer (talk) 02:37, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
February 2008
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 02:39, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Cphints1, you will be blocked from editing. It's SPAM. Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 02:41, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Paintboy100. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. BrucePodger (talk) 02:41, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Cphints1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I hadnt read the terms, and the information was true, and i now know the rules. I am very sorry. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I hadnt read the terms, and the information was true, and i now know the rules. I am very sorry. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I hadnt read the terms, and the information was true, and i now know the rules. I am very sorry. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}