Jump to content

Talk:Tunak Tunak Tun: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:


This song has no literal translation. It's just nonsense. [[Special:Contributions/24.46.137.154|24.46.137.154]] ([[User talk:24.46.137.154|talk]]) 03:22, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
This song has no literal translation. It's just nonsense. [[Special:Contributions/24.46.137.154|24.46.137.154]] ([[User talk:24.46.137.154|talk]]) 03:22, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

What kind of nonsense? Some attempt at translation would be good. People have translated 'jabberwocky".
[[User:Notenderwiggin|Notenderwiggin]] ([[User talk:Notenderwiggin|talk]]) 20:58, 10 March 2008 (UTC)


== External Lik - Noteworthy? ==
== External Lik - Noteworthy? ==

Revision as of 20:58, 10 March 2008

i nominate this article as a featured article@ !Partapdua1 04:30, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]



lyrical content?

Why does the article not discuss, at all, the lyrics of the song? I'm not asking for a full reprint of the lyrics, just a statement about what the song is about. --70.171.187.183 17:22, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I second this; most other popular non-english songs have at least a brief translation... Igob8a 02:30, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This song has no literal translation. It's just nonsense. 24.46.137.154 (talk) 03:22, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of nonsense? Some attempt at translation would be good. People have translated 'jabberwocky". Notenderwiggin (talk) 20:58, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External Lik - Noteworthy?

This link:

Doesn't seem noteworthy enough to include. It isn't referenced in the article and has no real information. I can't see any reason to keep it. 142.162.148.28 (talk) 21:43, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]