User talk:DangerTM

G O I N G

This user was going, but is staying for a while to clear his name.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

DangerTM (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Yeah, but for the other things I wouldn't have been indefinately blocked, such as incivility, which is the whole point of my argument

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Yeah, but for the other things I wouldn't have been indefinately blocked, such as incivility, which is the whole point of my argument |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Yeah, but for the other things I wouldn't have been indefinately blocked, such as incivility, which is the whole point of my argument |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Yeah, but for the other things I wouldn't have been indefinately blocked, such as incivility, which is the whole point of my argument |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DangerTM (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This account is not a sockpuppet account, I have used my right to vansish, I have not used sockpuppetry on this account, you can block me for the other things, but don't block me for sockpuppetry, vanishing is well wothin my rights as a wikipedian

Decline reason:

You were blocked for the other things. .ιΙι.WODUP.ιIι. 06:08, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

REPLY

This is not a sockpuppet account, saying that I am tom.mevlie is not an admission of being a sockpuppet, if you haven't noticed, all of those accounts have been inactive, along with tom.mevlie, it is absurd that you block me for something that I haven't done. From this account, I haven't partaken in any sockpuppetry activities. Block me for the other things, I implore you, but do not block me for the sockpuppetry thing, it is simply not true. I wanted to vanish, I wanted to flee from the tom.mevlie image, let me go in peace and you will never hear from me or this stupid account ever again.DangerTM (talk) 05:40, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I know I have, I don't care about the incivility, don't you blokes listen? What I want is for you to reply to my posting instead of just saying the same thing, what I am being blocked for is not the problem, why you won't tell me why you won't disbale the sockpup block is.DangerTM (talk) 06:08, 19 March 2008 (UTC)