Talk:Calliphora vicina: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Angelina5288 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The only thing that I can see that needs improvement is that the biology section needs more internal links. Some links you could do are meron, coxa, and notopleuron. Basically you should link terms that an "Average Joe" wouldn't understand. --[[User:Angelina5288|Angelina5288]] ([[User talk:Angelina5288|talk]]) 19:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC) |
The only thing that I can see that needs improvement is that the biology section needs more internal links. Some links you could do are meron, coxa, and notopleuron. Basically you should link terms that an "Average Joe" wouldn't understand. --[[User:Angelina5288|Angelina5288]] ([[User talk:Angelina5288|talk]]) 19:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC) |
||
Thanks for the tip. However, only coxa has a link on Wikipedia, so only it can be internally linked. [[User:Colstewart71639|Colstewart71639]] ([[User talk:Colstewart71639|talk]]) 01:25, 26 March 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:25, 26 March 2008
![]() | This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 21 March 2008. Further details are available here. |
![]() | Arthropods Unassessed | |||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Calliphora vicina appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 March 2008 (check views). A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/March. | ![]() |
The only thing that I can see that needs improvement is that the biology section needs more internal links. Some links you could do are meron, coxa, and notopleuron. Basically you should link terms that an "Average Joe" wouldn't understand. --Angelina5288 (talk) 19:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the tip. However, only coxa has a link on Wikipedia, so only it can be internally linked. Colstewart71639 (talk) 01:25, 26 March 2008 (UTC)