Talk:Calliphora vicina: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:25, 26 March 2008

This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 21 March 2008. Further details are available here.

Arthropods Unassessed

	Arthropods portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArthropodsWikipedia:WikiProject ArthropodsTemplate:WikiProject ArthropodsArthropods articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Calliphora vicina appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 March 2008 (check views). A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/March.

Wikipedia

The only thing that I can see that needs improvement is that the biology section needs more internal links. Some links you could do are meron, coxa, and notopleuron. Basically you should link terms that an "Average Joe" wouldn't understand. --Angelina5288 (talk) 19:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip. However, only coxa has a link on Wikipedia, so only it can be internally linked. Colstewart71639 (talk) 01:25, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 19:24, 25 March 2008 edit Angelina5288 (talk \| contribs) 38 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:25, 26 March 2008 edit undo Colstewart71639 (talk \| contribs) 36 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:

	The only thing that I can see that needs improvement is that the biology section needs more internal links. Some links you could do are meron, coxa, and notopleuron. Basically you should link terms that an "Average Joe" wouldn't understand. --[[User:Angelina5288\|Angelina5288]] ([[User talk:Angelina5288\|talk]]) 19:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)		The only thing that I can see that needs improvement is that the biology section needs more internal links. Some links you could do are meron, coxa, and notopleuron. Basically you should link terms that an "Average Joe" wouldn't understand. --[[User:Angelina5288\|Angelina5288]] ([[User talk:Angelina5288\|talk]]) 19:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)


			Thanks for the tip. However, only coxa has a link on Wikipedia, so only it can be internally linked. [[User:Colstewart71639\|Colstewart71639]] ([[User talk:Colstewart71639\|talk]]) 01:25, 26 March 2008 (UTC)