Talk:Entomological evidence collection

Good summation of the common procedures. The only thing I can offer is to include actual technique in the form of illustrations, The textbook for the class has several good examples and any artist can help you out. Other than that, great job! 165.91.58.67 (talk) 00:36, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Very interesting article! However, there are many spelling and grammatical errors in this article, to the point of distraction. There are also places where this article is very vague, such as in the Temperature, Weather, and Climate section and the Pupa section. More links to other articles might help to alleviate this. Other than that, awesome topic! --Moosenik (talk) 18:46, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Maybe go into a little more detail on collection and add more pictures and figures so the reader can get a better grasp on the topic. Other than that, the article was real interesting. Dbw279 (talk) 20:46, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Hey guys. It looks nice except there are no links to other articles on wikipedia. Try this link for an easy way to link some popular terms in your article.[1] Also, you have your sources cited, but not using wikipedia's formatting . Try this for some help on citing things properly, or I can help you out. It isn't that difficult once you get the hang of it. --PinDr4gon (talk) 22:12, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Hey this page looks amazing! Couple quick areas of improvement: try to divide up the long list of materials (don't get rid of any of them!) if possible. For example, make 2 columns of information one possibly containing materials necesarry for collection and the other for preservation? Just an example. Also, the picture you have is rather large, which is taking away from the content a bit. If you can resize it and upload it again I think I would make a difference. As always, looking great! --Amandamartinez06 (talk) 17:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey the article looks good, but I made a few inserts. I added sticky traps and a thermos of boiling water to your list of materials; as well as elaborating on the use of sticky traps in the collection of adult insects. Austinh37 (talk) 20:05, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

The list of materials used in a collection kit is very detailed, great job. You might want to look at some of the phrasing in this section. There are some grammatical errors, missing uppercase letters, and some poor usage of punctuation (a few missed or unnecessary periods). AMFaris (talk) 16:57, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

This is a very detailed article and describes the life of a forensic entomologist on duty as vividly as I could imagine it but I do have one question. There is alot of detail concerning the collection of larvae, pupa, adult, etc. but it never quite specifies if there is a specific order in which they should be collected. Does it matter if you collect adults first? Or larvae first? Good job on all yalls hard work! Keep it up! --Cal101387 (talk) 05:32, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Very interesting article, defenately have an idea and wont be lost when I sart to collect my evidence for lab (432). Maybe article can be a little more flowing and not so choppy. Many grammatical errors, to note one in the labeling section, second sentence after 'following' have a ":" or a "-". Agbetty (talk) 22:15, 15 April 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.194.32.49 (talk)

I like how this article is very detailed and all the sections are clearly labeled. More pictures might make things seem a little more interesting, especially when it comes to the 'Collection Materials' section. Pictures of the different types of equipment might be a good addition. Also, the fact that you listed the tools with bullets was great, but the grammar and punctuation needs a little bit of work. You might want to use parentheses when describing the use of certain tools so the individual bullets aren't as lengthy. Just a thought. Other than that, this article was great! I enjoyed reading it! --Sweetypie2305 (talk) 11:32, 15 April 2008 (UTC)