User talk:FisherQueen: Difference between revisions
Caspian blue (talk | contribs) |
→hey: new section |
||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
You side him which is not clearly a compromised version with me or other anon at all. You not only reverted to include the vulgarism, but also well organized alignment. You're also involved in voicing your opinion on this, so you're not a meditator. I request you to revert it to the previous version before Sennen goroshi ''vandalise''. (Why didn't you give a warning to him? That is also the fact that you're not neutral.)--[[User:Appletrees|Appletrees]] ([[User talk:Appletrees|talk]]) 16:13, 23 April 2008 (UTC) |
You side him which is not clearly a compromised version with me or other anon at all. You not only reverted to include the vulgarism, but also well organized alignment. You're also involved in voicing your opinion on this, so you're not a meditator. I request you to revert it to the previous version before Sennen goroshi ''vandalise''. (Why didn't you give a warning to him? That is also the fact that you're not neutral.)--[[User:Appletrees|Appletrees]] ([[User talk:Appletrees|talk]]) 16:13, 23 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
== hey == |
|||
we talked the other day. I will make it brief. |
|||
see her myspace http://www.myspace.com/JuliannaRoseMauriello |
|||
I do not understand. How a few admins can claim anything different. |
|||
the problem is is to alot of people she is a "loli". |
|||
Many people will not even admit they are attracted to her. |
|||
But its strange out of ALL the editors to her page over the last 2 years, MOST are the same exact people. |
|||
interesting? |
|||
They ignore her myspace and her imdb.com to satisfy themselves? |
|||
This will never end, even if she would do an interview these people on wikipedia would STILL claim she was straight because it ruins their fantasy. |
|||
I WORKED with her for FOUR DAYS straight. I MET her wife, I KNOW for a FACT. |
|||
I believe that most if not all of the editors on wikipedia ALSO KNOW for a fact she is gay. They just dont want to admit it. |
Revision as of 11:23, 24 April 2008
FisherQueen
| |
---|---|
![]() Churches of Christ articleThere's a new user at the article (Mark0880) putting in a lot of information that all seems to be unreferenced. I've talked to him on several occasions and he seems to have his heart in the right place, but he keeps inserting information that seems much more appropriate for a sermon or tract than an encyclopedia [1] [2]. Since you have experience with this article, I thought I'd come to you first and see if you could suggest a tact to take with him. I was just vandal fighting and drawn to the artile, I'm not really familiar with using references such as the Bible on articles dealing with religious matters. Thanks! Redrocket (talk) 02:51, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
request for block granted![]()
I swear this is why we need a CSD tag for hoaxes/joke articles. "Aerobic Beading with Richard Simmons"? "Snow White and the Seven Beads"? This reads more like a bored kid in school made this up. Wildthing61476 (talk) 15:46, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
A question for youHiya FQ, hoping the weather finds you sunny and your bank balance finds you rich. I've a question for you - if you would be so kind, have a gander at the history of Richard Ofshe, particularly the contributions of 89.159.146.254 (talk · contribs). You can see in my AIV report why I've been reverting - a source of "personal knowledge - Richard Ofshe" raises obvious WP:RS and WP:COI issues. Steve Crossin declined to block and fair enough given his rational, but hasn't responded to my question on his talk page. I'm perfectly willing to allow that this may not be an AIV matter, what I'd really like though is an option for a case like this, when after numerous postings on their talk page, there's been no reply and ongoing edits to the Ofshe page. I'm aware of WP:PARENT - I'm looking for advice, not a block, and am keenly aware of my shortcomings in comprehension of many policies and guidelines. As always, the distilled wisdom of your many moons as an admin is the only beverage that will slake my thirst. I should write hallmark cards for wikipedians. WLU (talk) 15:10, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Re: I wil raise RFCHe falsely calls me a vandal as I restoring the previous compact version and his behavior is highly uncivil and suits personal attack. I don't think the vulgarism should be included in the article, so I will raise RFC to resolve this absurd dispute. --Appletrees (talk) 15:31, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Your revert is not a settlement.You side him which is not clearly a compromised version with me or other anon at all. You not only reverted to include the vulgarism, but also well organized alignment. You're also involved in voicing your opinion on this, so you're not a meditator. I request you to revert it to the previous version before Sennen goroshi vandalise. (Why didn't you give a warning to him? That is also the fact that you're not neutral.)--Appletrees (talk) 16:13, 23 April 2008 (UTC) heywe talked the other day. I will make it brief. see her myspace http://www.myspace.com/JuliannaRoseMauriello I do not understand. How a few admins can claim anything different. the problem is is to alot of people she is a "loli". Many people will not even admit they are attracted to her. But its strange out of ALL the editors to her page over the last 2 years, MOST are the same exact people. interesting? They ignore her myspace and her imdb.com to satisfy themselves? This will never end, even if she would do an interview these people on wikipedia would STILL claim she was straight because it ruins their fantasy. I WORKED with her for FOUR DAYS straight. I MET her wife, I KNOW for a FACT. I believe that most if not all of the editors on wikipedia ALSO KNOW for a fact she is gay. They just dont want to admit it. |