Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Say Hey: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 21: Line 21:
*'''Delete''' Yes, I think you can safely say I feel it should be '''DELETED!!'''\
*'''Delete''' Yes, I think you can safely say I feel it should be '''DELETED!!'''\
*'''Delete''' This needs to be deleted, I am the "HollabackPat" mentioned, I don't like this sort of trashy thing, why can't we be adults.
*'''Delete''' This needs to be deleted, I am the "HollabackPat" mentioned, I don't like this sort of trashy thing, why can't we be adults.
*'''Keep''' Sayhey is culturally significant to the the same level that other websites like Slashdot and Popbitch (which have their own Wikipedia entries) are. Probably the bits which defame individuals should be removed. But anything which reflects the sites internal culture, and nature of debate is worthy of detailing in Wikipedia. Cheers. (nickipee on sayhey)

Revision as of 23:32, 11 August 2005

An article on a message board on a Kylie Minogue website - that's probably reason to delete. The current longer version is a (probably defametory) record of trolling on that website. Attempts to redirect to Kylie have been reverted. --Doc (?) 11:51, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strong delete and then protect... a good example of why we can't include too many forum articles: they quickly turn into heaping piles of shit. In any case, a section of a singer's website is not encyclopedically notable anyway. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:08, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, recreate as redirect to Willie Mays, and protect. android79 12:23, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
  • Sayhey is a pop culture phenomenon inmvolving thousands of people, and it has made mainstream influences. The entry must stay but needs to be protected from vandalism.(unsigned comment by User:203.164.52.84)
  • Delete. Kylie cruft. / Peter Isotalo 13:18, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Obvious delete. Unencyclopedic, WP:N, WP:V. An article whose subject is an internet message forum.—Encephalon | ζ | Σ 13:50:18, 2005-08-11 (UTC)
  • Everything that you keep deleting has been entirely factual, non-defamatory... and interesting from a pop culture point of view. Please stop vandalising this entry. This is fascism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.164.52.84 (talkcontribs) 2005-08-11 13:04:09 UTC (UTC)
  • I've temporarily protected the article, and blocked the several three-revert rule violators and the one persistent vandal who had already been warned. Please note during this discussion that there is a dispute over the contents of this article. You may wish to also refer to the other version whilst discussing the article's deletion. Uncle G 13:58:35, 2005-08-11 (UTC)
Unsigned vote by JDoorjam ~~~~ ( ! | ? | * ) 21:12, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete ~~~~ ( ! | ? | * ) 21:12, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this steaming pile of turd. It's another attempt from some very disturbed individuals to voice their slanderous and bitchy opinions on others that they don't know in a bid to make themselves feel a little bit more important. Some of the members on the Say Hey forum are incredibly immature and have way too much time on their hands. So, yeah....Delete this waste of space until someone can write something at least worthy of being read by mature adults....NONE of which frequent that bloody forum!! Unsigned vote by 172.203.75.19 - whom I take it is voting delete
  • Delete Yes, I think you can safely say I feel it should be DELETED!!\
  • Delete This needs to be deleted, I am the "HollabackPat" mentioned, I don't like this sort of trashy thing, why can't we be adults.
  • Keep Sayhey is culturally significant to the the same level that other websites like Slashdot and Popbitch (which have their own Wikipedia entries) are. Probably the bits which defame individuals should be removed. But anything which reflects the sites internal culture, and nature of debate is worthy of detailing in Wikipedia. Cheers. (nickipee on sayhey)