Talk:Electrical conductor: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 75.154.100.182 - "→Name change or merge: " |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
[[Conductor (material)]] → [[Electrical conductor]] – The article is about electrical conductors and has nothing about other conductors, like heat conductors. The name would be more accurate and would eliminate the need for the "(material)" disambiguation. -- [[User:Kjkolb|Kjkolb]] 08:48, 25 April 2006 (UTC) |
[[Conductor (material)]] → [[Electrical conductor]] – The article is about electrical conductors and has nothing about other conductors, like heat conductors. The name would be more accurate and would eliminate the need for the "(material)" disambiguation. -- [[User:Kjkolb|Kjkolb]] 08:48, 25 April 2006 (UTC) |
||
:No opposition --> moved. —[[User:Nightstallion|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">Nightst</span>]]<font color="green">[[User:Nightstallion/esperanza|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">a</span>]]</font>[[User:Nightstallion|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">llion</span>]] [[User talk:Nightstallion|''(?)'']] <sup>[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Elections and Referenda|''Seen this already?'']]</sup> 15:52, 1 May 2006 (UTC) |
:No opposition --> moved. —[[User:Nightstallion|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">Nightst</span>]]<font color="green">[[User:Nightstallion/esperanza|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">a</span>]]</font>[[User:Nightstallion|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">llion</span>]] [[User talk:Nightstallion|''(?)'']] <sup>[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Elections and Referenda|''Seen this already?'']]</sup> 15:52, 1 May 2006 (UTC) |
||
==Namespace consistency with Insulator (Electrical)== |
|||
I'm wondering if this article should be renamed (again?) in similar fashion to the Insulator article, which is named [[Insulator (electrical)]]. If consistency is preferred between related articles, this article should be renamed [[Conductor (Electrical)]] or that article should be renamed [[Electrical insulator]] Cheers, [[Special:Contributions/67.150.173.170|67.150.173.170]] ([[User talk:67.150.173.170|talk]]) 07:17, 17 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 07:17, 17 May 2008
- Merge. Both articles are about the same thing, differs only in the scientific background. A chemical discuss about conductors (eletric an heat) shall be write also. Luan Carvalho Martins 16:50, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Done :) Dan 17:53, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
Name change or merge
I was going to suggest that the name of the article be changed to "electrical conductor" because "conductor (material)" could also refer to conductors of heat and it would allow us to get rid of the parentheses. However, I found out there's an article called electrical conduction, which could cover electrical conductors. So should the article stay the same, have its name changed to "electrical conductor", or be merged into electrical conduction? -- Kjkolb 08:19, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
HOW ABOUT THIS NO SO U SUX WIERDO
[[Media:Media:Example.oggffffdsd
]] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.154.100.182 (talk) 01:11, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Requested move
Conductor (material) → Electrical conductor – The article is about electrical conductors and has nothing about other conductors, like heat conductors. The name would be more accurate and would eliminate the need for the "(material)" disambiguation. -- Kjkolb 08:48, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- No opposition --> moved. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 15:52, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Namespace consistency with Insulator (Electrical)
I'm wondering if this article should be renamed (again?) in similar fashion to the Insulator article, which is named Insulator (electrical). If consistency is preferred between related articles, this article should be renamed Conductor (Electrical) or that article should be renamed Electrical insulator Cheers, 67.150.173.170 (talk) 07:17, 17 May 2008 (UTC)