User talk:Tom S 48: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:22, 21 August 2005

Welcome!

Hi Tom S 48! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

Ken ^{talk|contribs} 00:15, August 18, 2005 (UTC)

personal attacks

Please not that one of our core policies is Wikipedia:no personal attacks. That includes remarks like "are you learning impaired?". Please treat your fellow editors in a civil, collegial manner. Thanks, -Willmcw 19:14, August 18, 2005 (UTC)

3RR warning

You are in danger of violating the three revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. -Willmcw 02:13, August 20, 2005 (UTC)

I haven't reverted this article today. What are you talking about. According to the rules, unsourced articles and opinions may be deleted by ANY editor. I have simply deleted the unscorced parts to the articls. I have been studying the guidelines and rules for days. Have been reading these articles and researching for days as an editor, and have found that all the resources linked on this pages of CARM, Slick and Ratcliff to be without any resources that are reliable. Have you checked? They were all personal websites, blogs, discussion boards that are NEVER to be used as reliable sources. I have NOT done reverts but have edited one at a timeTom S 48 03:24, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Either adding or subtracting the same material counts as a "revert". It doesn't matter whether the edits were "justified" or not, unless there is actual vandalism involved, which isn't the issue here.

And so on. Please do not keep reverting or you will be blocked. Thanks, -Willmcw

Based on your comments to this page, Talk:Matt Slick, I think that you have previously been warned of the 3RR rule under your IP address accounts. Therefore I'm blocking you for 24 hours. When you return please act in a more civil manner and do not participate in edit warring. -Willmcw 04:21, August 20, 2005 (UTC)

There were several of us using the account as explained intially and we stated that fact on the discussion pages. We did not understand that doing an edit is considered a revert when we haven't reverted anything. Tom, (spouse, not wanting to use real name because of aarm poster threats) and another CARM supporter. The other two signed on today for their own accounts as directed by you, to get their own accounts as Peggy Sue and Interested Party, as we told you, we are working together on the edits, and you blocked all the accounts. We have a problem here, that the other editors continue to remove our edits, and now all of us blocked. Apology for the misunderstanding but we are separate people working together. We did as you asked and I didn't use my Tom S account. Looks like, there is no possible way to receive fair treatment here as long as aarm users are running the CARM edits.Tom S 48 00:22, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 04:21, 20 August 2005 edit User2004 (talk \| contribs) 23,415 edits →‎3RR warning: you've apparently been warned before. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:22, 21 August 2005 edit undo Tom S 48 (talk \| contribs) 123 edits →‎3RR warning Next edit →
Line 20:		Line 20:

	:Based on your comments to this page, [[Talk:Matt Slick]], I think that you have previously been warned of the 3RR rule under your IP address accounts. Therefore I'm blocking you for 24 hours. When you return please act in a more civil manner and do not participate in edit warring. -[[User:Willmcw\|Willmcw]] 04:21, August 20, 2005 (UTC)		:Based on your comments to this page, [[Talk:Matt Slick]], I think that you have previously been warned of the 3RR rule under your IP address accounts. Therefore I'm blocking you for 24 hours. When you return please act in a more civil manner and do not participate in edit warring. -[[User:Willmcw\|Willmcw]] 04:21, August 20, 2005 (UTC)

			There were several of us using the account as explained intially and we stated that fact on the discussion pages. We did not understand that doing an edit is considered a revert when we haven't reverted anything. Tom, (spouse, not wanting to use real name because of aarm poster threats) and another CARM supporter. The other two signed on today for their own accounts as directed by you, to get their own accounts as Peggy Sue and Interested Party, as we told you, we are working together on the edits, and you blocked all the accounts. We have a problem here, that the other editors continue to remove our edits, and now all of us blocked. Apology for the misunderstanding but we are separate people working together. We did as you asked and I didn't use my Tom S account. Looks like, there is no possible way to receive fair treatment here as long as aarm users are running the CARM edits.[[User:Tom S 48\|Tom S 48]] 00:22, 21 August 2005 (UTC)