Talk:Right of abode in Hong Kong: Difference between revisions
Lots of key issue missing |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
The judgment of Court of Final Appeal is not the cause of "Right of abode issue". It is the process. When talking the cause, it should be start from the handover, or the neglect of both government, or even the Joint Declaration itself. It is POV to blame the Court of Final Appeal at the very start of description the cause of the issue. |
The judgment of Court of Final Appeal is not the cause of "Right of abode issue". It is the process. When talking the cause, it should be start from the handover, or the neglect of both government, or even the Joint Declaration itself. It is POV to blame the Court of Final Appeal at the very start of description the cause of the issue. |
||
--[[User:Csmth|Csmth]] ([[User talk:Csmth|talk]]) 17:49, 30 December 2007 (UTC) |
--[[User:Csmth|Csmth]] ([[User talk:Csmth|talk]]) 17:49, 30 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
i was married to a hong kong citizen who died 10 years ago. am i eligible for hk citizenship |
|||
Revision as of 02:31, 28 May 2008
{{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. | Hong Kong B‑class Top‑importance | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Non-chinese right of abode?
What is the right of abode of people that are not chinese citizens? Do all those Brits and ex-pat Aussie and Americans have any rights, some were even born there. What about guest workers who've been in HK for a decade or longer? SchmuckyTheCat 22:43, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
- the answer is here: http://www.immd.gov.hk/ehtml/faq_roaihksar.htm so now we just need to work it into the article. SchmuckyTheCat 22:55, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
Lots of key issue missing
The background of the issue is missing:
- In 1980s Hongkong gave up Touch Base Policy
- "Right of abode" defined in Joint Declaration, Appendix 1
- The cause/flaw in Joint Declaration, Appendix 1
- The flaw in Basic Law provision as following the Appendix 1
- The neglect of both Chinese and British government before handover
The basic issue is missing:
- Legitimate Expectation from the HK right of abode claimant based on Basic Law
- The incompatibility between Basic Law and local Ordinance
- The massive arrest by Immigration Department
The judgment of Court of Final Appeal is not the cause of "Right of abode issue". It is the process. When talking the cause, it should be start from the handover, or the neglect of both government, or even the Joint Declaration itself. It is POV to blame the Court of Final Appeal at the very start of description the cause of the issue. --Csmth (talk) 17:49, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
i was married to a hong kong citizen who died 10 years ago. am i eligible for hk citizenship