User talk:BarbaraSue: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:13, 1 June 2008

June 2008

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Deirdre McCloskey. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your section starts by referring to NYT, then states things that it may not support (hard to check without the reference), and lists only refs to the archives of sexual behavior, whose editors and authors are principles in the controversy that you are referring to and therefore not suitable sources per WP:BLP. Dicklyon (talk) 06:01, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is amusing that you think your opinions about controversies transcends the New York Times. Everything I added is supported in the reference that I added, which if you actually read, you'll agree to.BarbaraSue (talk) 06:05, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you'll put it back with a ref to the New York Times, and without the ref to the archives, we could consider it (see if the content is verifiable there). But for now I think it's a BLP violation, and therefore can not stand without a citation for verification. Please also be aware of the WP:3RR, for which you are now on warning. Dicklyon (talk) 06:11, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Be aware yourself.BarbaraSue (talk) 06:13, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 06:11, 1 June 2008 edit Dicklyon (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 466,063 edits 3RR warning ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:13, 1 June 2008 edit undo BarbaraSue (talk \| contribs) 40 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 5:		Line 5:

	:If you'll put it back with a ref to the New York Times, and without the ref to the archives, we could consider it (see if the content is verifiable there). But for now I think it's a BLP violation, and therefore can not stand without a citation for verification. Please also be aware of the [[WP:3RR]], for which you are now on warning. [[User:Dicklyon\|Dicklyon]] ([[User talk:Dicklyon\|talk]]) 06:11, 1 June 2008 (UTC)		:If you'll put it back with a ref to the New York Times, and without the ref to the archives, we could consider it (see if the content is verifiable there). But for now I think it's a BLP violation, and therefore can not stand without a citation for verification. Please also be aware of the [[WP:3RR]], for which you are now on warning. [[User:Dicklyon\|Dicklyon]] ([[User talk:Dicklyon\|talk]]) 06:11, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

			Be aware yourself.[[User:BarbaraSue\|BarbaraSue]] ([[User talk:BarbaraSue#top\|talk]]) 06:13, 1 June 2008 (UTC)