Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poptropica: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
"Voting" keep |
Idocartoons (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*'''Keep'''. Reliable sources - [http://www.cnw.ca/fr/releases/archive/May2008/14/c8396.html], [http://parenting.ivillage.com/familyentertainment_csm/web/0,,d435k3mr,00.html],. <font face="jokerman">[[User:Corvus cornix|<span style="color:green">Corvus cornix</span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:Corvus cornix|<span style="color:Green">talk</span>]]''</sub></font> 22:43, 9 June 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Keep'''. Reliable sources - [http://www.cnw.ca/fr/releases/archive/May2008/14/c8396.html], [http://parenting.ivillage.com/familyentertainment_csm/web/0,,d435k3mr,00.html],. <font face="jokerman">[[User:Corvus cornix|<span style="color:green">Corvus cornix</span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:Corvus cornix|<span style="color:Green">talk</span>]]''</sub></font> 22:43, 9 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Weak keep''' adequately attested on the web. [[User:JJL|JJL]] ([[User talk:JJL|talk]]) 23:09, 9 June 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Weak keep''' adequately attested on the web. [[User:JJL|JJL]] ([[User talk:JJL|talk]]) 23:09, 9 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment'''. I am the author of the article. I revisit the article every couple of days to clean it up and make sure the original context and grammar is upheld. This article references an extremely popular kids game, and kids love to come in and add their own commentary to the article ( hence the occasional poor grammar ). Thank you for the suggestions and article points for reference. I will go into the article and update immediately. ([[User:Idocartoons|Idocartoons]] ([[User talk:Idocartoons|talk]]) 13:38, 10 June 2008 (UTC)) --[[User:idocartoons]]<font color="black">[[User_talk:idocartoons|o]]</font><font color="green">[[Special:Contributions/idocartoons|r]]</font> 9:32, 10 June 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:38, 10 June 2008
- Poptropica (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
It's a non notable game. Megata Sanshiro (talk) 17:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 18:01, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment. Can you please go into more detail about the steps you've taken to make reasonably certain that this article cannot be improved, and that we are best off with not covering this topic rather than covering it in some other way, and the places and methods you've used to search for more sources? --Kizor 19:10, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Comment A quick Google search is comes up with ~44K results. Most of the ones I saw in them were either forums, blogs, or other unreliable(?) sites. Given the results of the above (and that the subject is an online game), it seems that it may not be notable or at least not notable yet. If no reliable sources can be found, the my !vote is delete. NanohaA'sYuriTalk, My master 20:28, 9 June 2008 (UTC)- Keep The sources seem like an acceptable starting point. NanohaA'sYuriTalk, My master 23:22, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Reliable sources - [1], [2],. Corvus cornixtalk 22:43, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Weak keep adequately attested on the web. JJL (talk) 23:09, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment. I am the author of the article. I revisit the article every couple of days to clean it up and make sure the original context and grammar is upheld. This article references an extremely popular kids game, and kids love to come in and add their own commentary to the article ( hence the occasional poor grammar ). Thank you for the suggestions and article points for reference. I will go into the article and update immediately. (Idocartoons (talk) 13:38, 10 June 2008 (UTC)) --User:idocartoonsor 9:32, 10 June 2008 (UTC)