Jump to content

User talk:Corsulian: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Corsulian (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==[[List of Fraternities and Sororities at George Mason University]]==
Hello. I was wondering if we could talk a minute about your List of Fraternities and Sororities at George Mason University page. You have done a great with the page over time. I feel have some good information to add, but I would like to discuss it with you off line first. It pertains to Sigma Chi - Iota Xi Chapter. I am authoritative on this chapter from inception in 1985 (colony) through current. Please contact me at liamknuj4321@hotmail.com.


==[[List of Notable Phi Sigma Kappa Brothers]]==
==[[List of Notable Phi Sigma Kappa Brothers]]==



Revision as of 14:03, 10 June 2008

Hello. I was wondering if we could talk a minute about your List of Fraternities and Sororities at George Mason University page. You have done a great with the page over time. I feel have some good information to add, but I would like to discuss it with you off line first. It pertains to Sigma Chi - Iota Xi Chapter. I am authoritative on this chapter from inception in 1985 (colony) through current. Please contact me at liamknuj4321@hotmail.com.


Hello. I've noticed you have created an article List of Notable Phi Sigma Kappa Brothers This appears to be a duplicate of the list at Phi Sigma Kappa. Is it your intention that the new article should replace the list on the main article or stand alongside it?B1atv 17:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're fast. I created List of Notable Phi Sigma Kappa Brothers before deleting the list from the Phi Sigma Kappa page. Corsulian
Thanks for your response and I'm sorry if I offended you. I'm on "vandal patrol" tonight (it's fun!) - and if you don't move fast the new articles move down the page and are lost. I thought your new article would make sense as you have done it but not as I feared it may have been. Hope you don't mind me asking you. B1atv 17:28, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Xi Septaton

An article that you have been involved in editing, Xi Septaton, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xi Septaton. Thank you. Acidskater 02:44, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:PSKCrest gif75.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:PSKCrest gif75.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

Hey Corsulian, I noticed you started this page (which was recently renamed to take "notable" out of its title, per the notability guideline), and have been a major editor to the page; thanks for that. My question: do you have a source you are using for the informaiton on the page? If so, could you add a citation for that source to the page? I am concerned that without any sources, the page will raise red flags with respect to Wikipedia's verifiability policy. Thanks. UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:55, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My main edit to that page was just forming it as its own list page rather than have it as a cluttered extension of the Phi Sigma Kappa page. I will soon scan through it--the majority of those brothers are likely listed in the Phi Sigma Kappa self-published new member manual, "Hills and a Star." Corsulian (talk) 19:25, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Can you add a source citation, citing the new member manual, to the article page? Otherwise the article does not conform to the verifiability policy and may be subject to deletion (which is not a good outcome given the amount of work you have put into it). UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:50, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Given there are no sources for the article, I have proposed it for deletion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:10, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't see any deletion proposal--but I did add a handful of references. I started adding them for each entry but it looked silly. I'll see about a cleaner way to prove each one. At a cursory glance, I'd say about 95% from from Hills and a Star.Corsulian (talk) 20:33, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]