Jump to content

Talk:Operation Noble Eagle: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
{{dyktalk|30 June|2008}}
→‎Comments: history problems
Line 20: Line 20:


I removed this because it sounds like more of a recruitment line than an encyclopedic statement. Also the above paragraph already states which groups operated as air interceptors during the operation. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.14.12.195|24.14.12.195]] ([[User talk:24.14.12.195|talk]]) 07:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I removed this because it sounds like more of a recruitment line than an encyclopedic statement. Also the above paragraph already states which groups operated as air interceptors during the operation. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.14.12.195|24.14.12.195]] ([[User talk:24.14.12.195|talk]]) 07:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


The History section needs work.
"The operation has cost more than $27 billion, according to a recent report compiled by the Congressional Research Service, but has not necessarily helped to prevent any additional horrific attacks on the US, such as a repeat of the Sept. 11 attacks." The article up to this point has described the operation as protecting both the US and Canada. Could this sentence read "North America" instead of US, or has the operation prevented attacks on Canada?
The article introduces the idea of a blip as "one of many possible solutions with the lingering difficulties in the mission"; however, the only problem that the article discusses is that "The aircraft maintainers, or mechanics, are currently "overworked and underpaid"." Also, if it is one of many solutions, why is only it being mentioned?
--I'll come up with a Username later, 7:47 PST 30 June 2008

Revision as of 14:49, 30 June 2008

WikiProject iconMilitary history: Canadian / North America / United States B‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Canadian military history task force
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force

Comments

"The air interceptors are manned by Active Duty US Air Force, Air National Guard, and AF Reserve units across the country; Ready to respond at a moment's notice."

I removed this because it sounds like more of a recruitment line than an encyclopedic statement. Also the above paragraph already states which groups operated as air interceptors during the operation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.14.12.195 (talk) 07:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


The History section needs work. "The operation has cost more than $27 billion, according to a recent report compiled by the Congressional Research Service, but has not necessarily helped to prevent any additional horrific attacks on the US, such as a repeat of the Sept. 11 attacks." The article up to this point has described the operation as protecting both the US and Canada. Could this sentence read "North America" instead of US, or has the operation prevented attacks on Canada? The article introduces the idea of a blip as "one of many possible solutions with the lingering difficulties in the mission"; however, the only problem that the article discusses is that "The aircraft maintainers, or mechanics, are currently "overworked and underpaid"." Also, if it is one of many solutions, why is only it being mentioned? --I'll come up with a Username later, 7:47 PST 30 June 2008