Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nokia 5320: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
afd2 |
→Nokia 5320: k |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:{{la|Nokia 5320}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Nokia 5320|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nokia 5320]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nokia 5320|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 June 30#{{anchorencode:Nokia 5320}}|View log]])</noinclude> |
:{{la|Nokia 5320}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Nokia 5320|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nokia 5320]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nokia 5320|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 June 30#{{anchorencode:Nokia 5320}}|View log]])</noinclude> |
||
Completely unreferenced information about a future product, so it's just crystal balling. There's no notability established and zero references. The article consists of a spec sheet, which leaves it reading like marketing material. [[User:Mikeblas|Mikeblas]] ([[User talk:Mikeblas|talk]]) 09:40, 30 June 2008 (UTC) |
Completely unreferenced information about a future product, so it's just crystal balling. There's no notability established and zero references. The article consists of a spec sheet, which leaves it reading like marketing material. [[User:Mikeblas|Mikeblas]] ([[User talk:Mikeblas|talk]]) 09:40, 30 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep'''. I can see your reasoning under [[WP:CRYSTAL]], however a quick Google [http://www.google.com/search?q=Nokia+5320 search] provides Nokia's announcement, pictures of the phone, and announcements on various industry sites and blogs. As this is only a few months from general release (opposed to being a concept), I would think it rates as much of an article as any released phone. I agree the article needs the attention of someone with knowledge of the area but I don't agree it's a a reason to delete. -[[User:Raerth|Raerth]] ([[User talk:Raerth|talk]]) 17:53, 30 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:53, 30 June 2008
- Nokia 5320 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Completely unreferenced information about a future product, so it's just crystal balling. There's no notability established and zero references. The article consists of a spec sheet, which leaves it reading like marketing material. Mikeblas (talk) 09:40, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. I can see your reasoning under WP:CRYSTAL, however a quick Google search provides Nokia's announcement, pictures of the phone, and announcements on various industry sites and blogs. As this is only a few months from general release (opposed to being a concept), I would think it rates as much of an article as any released phone. I agree the article needs the attention of someone with knowledge of the area but I don't agree it's a a reason to delete. -Raerth (talk) 17:53, 30 June 2008 (UTC)