Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex, Dead Dogs, and Me: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 12:04, 2 July 2008

Sex, Dead Dogs, and Me

Article about a book that is not important or significant. Damiens.rf 15:31, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails every facet of WP:BK Livitup (talk) 16:01, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:31, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not important or significant. Not sure the author is, either. Skinny87 (talk) 11:36, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Damiens, I'm Ed Williams. Glad to know you're the arbiter of what's important. I would rather you take the article down, it's not like it brings me one extra dollar. Good luck to you, you should be truly proud of yourself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.1.139.224 (talk) 01:11, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Ed, this debate shouldn't be taken personally as any kind of judgement against yourself or your work. It is merely a debate to decide if it belongs in Wikipedia according to the notability guidelines, which require multiple reliable sources published by third parties in detail about this specific subject (in this case, the book). Thank you and all the best.--Les boys (talk) 12:04, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 11:36, 2 July 2008 edit Skinny87 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 11,297 edits →‎Sex, Dead Dogs, and Me: - comment ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:04, 2 July 2008 edit undo Les boys (talk \| contribs) Rollbackers 1,156 edits comment Next edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Damiens, I'm Ed Williams. Glad to know you're the arbiter of what's important. I would rather you take the article down, it's not like it brings me one extra dollar. Good luck to you, you should be truly proud of yourself. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.1.139.224\|68.1.139.224]] ([[User talk:68.1.139.224\|talk]]) 01:11, 2 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		Damiens, I'm Ed Williams. Glad to know you're the arbiter of what's important. I would rather you take the article down, it's not like it brings me one extra dollar. Good luck to you, you should be truly proud of yourself. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.1.139.224\|68.1.139.224]] ([[User talk:68.1.139.224\|talk]]) 01:11, 2 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			*'''Comment''' - Ed, this debate shouldn't be taken personally as any kind of judgement against yourself or your work. It is merely a debate to decide if it belongs in Wikipedia according to the [[WP:N\|notability guidelines]], which require multiple [[WP:RS\|reliable sources]] published by ''third parties'' in detail about this specific subject (in this case, the book). Thank you and all the best.--[[User:Les boys\|Les boys]] ([[User talk:Les boys\|talk]]) 12:04, 2 July 2008 (UTC)