Talk:History of Darfur: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:38, 9 July 2008

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sudan.

in Darfur article?

Why oh why isn't this in the Darfur article? 66.160.174.167 01:16, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Summary style - Banyan Tree 01:18, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

this is cheap shit dont lisen to any of this if i can edit this shit then its deff not true go to another web site dont come to this —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.205.239.31 (talk) 03:29, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dali's Book still in use?

I'm not certain as to how true the comment that the Kitab Dali legal code is still preserved. From the best I can tell, the source is the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica, so what was true almost a century ago may not still hold true today, especially with the advent of independence.

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 :[[Wikipedia:Summary style]] - [[User:BanyanTree|Banyan]][[User talk:BanyanTree|Tree]] 01:18, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 this is cheap shit dont lisen to any of this if i can edit this shit then its deff not true go to another web site dont come to this  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/69.205.239.31|69.205.239.31]] ([[User talk:69.205.239.31|talk]]) 03:29, 17 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+== Dali's Book still in use? ==
+I'm not certain as to how true the comment that the Kitab Dali legal code is still preserved. From the best I can tell, the source is the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica, so what was true almost a century ago may not still hold true today, especially with the advent of independence.