Jump to content

User talk:Trugster: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
==International Throwball==
==International Throwball==
The only reason I didn't PROD that article was because I assumed he was going to remove that once it was put up, also, so I figured I'd give him a couple days to add some references or expand the article first (and after that period, I probably would have just AfD'd it.) Honestly, though, I don't think the article creator will ever improve the article to a keepable state, so the PROD is probably the best solution at the moment, but we'll see if he removes it. Thanks. [[User:Rnb|Rnb]] ([[User talk:Rnb|talk]]) 18:33, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
The only reason I didn't PROD that article was because I assumed he was going to remove that once it was put up, also, so I figured I'd give him a couple days to add some references or expand the article first (and after that period, I probably would have just AfD'd it.) Honestly, though, I don't think the article creator will ever improve the article to a keepable state, so the PROD is probably the best solution at the moment, but we'll see if he removes it. Thanks. [[User:Rnb|Rnb]] ([[User talk:Rnb|talk]]) 18:33, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

==Austen Lennon==

Thank you for you message regarding the links. I have read the pages and NONE of them apply to me. What I am interested in is who deemed them to be applicable to me? I have had many troubles with 'the other editor' in the past (and have won) I consider this to be just another continuation of his/her anger.

Revision as of 15:02, 10 July 2008

a message to myself Trugster 13:06, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks! :) --Geniac 13:02, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

International Throwball

The only reason I didn't PROD that article was because I assumed he was going to remove that once it was put up, also, so I figured I'd give him a couple days to add some references or expand the article first (and after that period, I probably would have just AfD'd it.) Honestly, though, I don't think the article creator will ever improve the article to a keepable state, so the PROD is probably the best solution at the moment, but we'll see if he removes it. Thanks. Rnb (talk) 18:33, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Austen Lennon

Thank you for you message regarding the links. I have read the pages and NONE of them apply to me. What I am interested in is who deemed them to be applicable to me? I have had many troubles with 'the other editor' in the past (and have won) I consider this to be just another continuation of his/her anger.