User talk:Vianello

Hi, I am the webmaster at atoboldon.com and this article was referenced only by british tabloids to try to sell newspapers. There is no way to "prove" a negative from our side and this as I said before, was totally ignored by all but one british paper trying to make a story out of nothing. And then mentioned by another rag in the UK. It never became a story, and to include here an article that says "allegedly written" when there was nothing ever alleged against Mr Boldon is highly irresponsible.

I trust that you will understand why we have deleted this false reference. There is inherent danger when supposed media houses take something supposedly found online, unproven and purely speculative, and attempt to make it a fact or even alleged which means that there is some possible factual basis behind it. There was none, and anyone within reach of a lawsuit stayed far away for a reason. We will continue to delete this ridiculous reference which negatively impacts Ato's character based on innuendo and an unproven internet fabrication.

If someone wrote an email letter, signed your name to it and put it online and it entailed rape, it would not be at all fair for a media house to say you were alleged in a letter to have committed rape, would it? Based on what? We trust we will not have this concern again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonylongman (talk • contribs) 06:48, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

hey, sorry about the long wait for reply. yeah, some one did use my account, however i reverted changes, and they copped a falcon punch to the face. haha yeah. sorry for the inconvenience. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Uryu Ishida (talk • contribs) 02:44, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Prodigious

Hi Vianello,

I noticed that you reverted my edit on the prodigious redirect. I understand that the word "prodigious" refers to more than the child prodigy article covers, however no other articles listed on the prodigy disambiguation page could be called "prodigious" because, other than child prodigy, they are all proper names. For this reason, the only article to which "prodigious" could currently refer is child prodigy. Would you mind if I redirected prodigious back to child prodigy?

Neelix (talk) 21:01, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi Vianello,

Thank you for your kind reply as well as your advice about archiving my talk page. I have done so according to your suggestion.

Happy editing,

Neelix (talk) 21:31, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Dalits

Do you have any idea what is going on at Talk:Dalits? Quite unintentionally, I seem to have stepped into a hornet's nest...and one of the hornets is very angry!!! Question...are 58.160.80.210 and Arjuna316 the same editor? I feel he is archiving and omitting and hiding talk that is very relevant and informative to the article. His actions make me question, again, his motives. Had I not been at the computer I would have missed his laughable threats. I don't really want to get involved with another "wack-job" but I also don't like the thought of that "wack-job" making threats. I was not in the least bit contentious or competitive. I tried to find a higher, common ground. I guess I should just....Move On!...thanks for letting me purge.--Buster7 (talk) 06:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks (Bedankt!)...I will move on, but I'm sure I will keep an eye on this article and revisit it. I seriously doubt that he is a Dalit. Basically, what he has done is hide 4 quality references that give creedence to his ancestors sad state of life. But...somewhere I read not to get stuck on editors...work on the articles!--Buster7 (talk) 08:09, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

remove the tag

Remove the tag and join the on my talk page if you have any problem Elcid007 (talk) 08:31, 4 July 2008 (UTC)elcid007 Hey vianello remove the tags from the wiki page and let me do my work Elcid007 (talk) 08:28, 4 July 2008 (UTC)elcid007

remove the tags from The LNM Institute of Information Technology

Hey vianello me and my friend are building the wiki page of our college. Is a non profit organisation. So please trust on us let us first develop the page and remove the tags. If later you have any problems do let us know in person. cZ@r (talk) 08:51, 4 July 2008 (UTC)sick_bug

What's new?

Hey man, its been a while. How are you? How is editing going? Drop me line. Later.Tm93 (talk) 07:40, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

• Is there a WikiProject about criminal court judges, or tv court judges to be more specific?

If possible please write me back on my talk page. Thanks and Happy Editing Tm93 (TALK) 21:07, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Emma368

Vianello, don't feed the troll - it just leads to more problems. _TalkIslander 19:15, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

• Fair point, fair point. I'm somewhat of the stance that anything that gets them deeper into hot water is all to the good of getting them further along the inevitable track to a permanent ban, but that's really just more of an oily little impulse/temptation than something I really think is the right course of action. I've always been rather succeptible to this sort of thing, unfortunately. I'll abide by what you say. - Vianello (talk) 19:19, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the barnstar! =) And the 'second' on the 3RR violation posting. =) Dp76764 (talk) 19:02, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

DoctorFrench

Thanks for the heads-up and trying to report him at WP:UAA. I've already messaged the admin who blocked User:DoctorFrench to see if he'd consider permanent block as a vandalism-only account and the fact he tried to impersonate me. Sadly the queue at WP:SSP is stil quite long, so it'll be a while yet before the sockpuppetry case is resolved. DrFrench (talk) 20:09, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

No worries. I think it was 23 June when I first suspected sockpuppetry. I was around last year when the original User:Davesmith33 account was blocked for persistent disruptive editing, the editing pattern just started to ring the alarm bells... DrFrench (talk) 20:45, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

User indef-blocked - clear impersonation, thus clear violaton of WP:IU :). _TalkIslander 20:54, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Top Gear

Are you willing to reach a negotiated settlement re: the Top Gear issues, or do we carry on with the fun and games? SabineSchmitz (talk) 18:36, 12 July 2008 (UTC)