User talk:Oakshade

Please participate

There is a heavy discussion right now, in this article, Miss Pakistan World here and it was nominated for deletion here; your opinion will be highly appreciated, especially your vote. Your participation in this matter is noteworthy, in view of the fact that you have participated in this discussion [1]. It doesn’t matter if your vote is favorable or not, but what matters most is your involvement since it seems to me that some commenter are against pageantry. Personally, I think that the article should be kept but should be freed from tremendous advertisement lines.--Richie Campbell (talk) 00:20, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Reunion place names

Hey! No worries about letting these AfDs play out if that's how editors want to handle it. Thanks for bringing this up. Gwen Gale (talk) 18:57, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Noah Kalina

That may be, but moving by copy and paste, as you did, is not proper - it destroys the page history. In order to move Everyday (video) back to Noah Kalina, an admin will have to do it.--Cúchullain ^t/c 20:31, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

It doesn't matter who moved it in the first place, or why - moving it back requires admin powers (because deletion and undeletion is involved). That's the only way to preserve the page history. If you want it moved back to Noah Kalina you should go to requested moves.--Cúchullain ^t/c 20:37, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the International Travels box. Cheers ChiragPatnaik (talk) 11:16, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Because a job well done is deserving of praise...

Hello! I wanted to let you know that I withdrew my AfD nomination for 1100 Grand Concourse. I also wanted to take the opportunity to show my appreciation of your effort to save the article from deletion. Please accept this as a token of my admiration for your contribution to the AfD process:

		The Rescue from Deletion Barnstar
		For your thoughtful and intelligent contributions to saving the article 1100 Grand Concourse from erasure in the AfD forums. Job well done! Ecoleetage (talk) 21:30, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Keep up the excellent work! Ecoleetage (talk) 21:30, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Bank Street

Your comments regarding keeping this article make sense. There isnt any reason for deletion. Note that the original user calling for the deletion (Beeblbrox) is aligned with Orladys argument re: attributing edits to a banned user for deletion. Neither user can give legitimate reason for the deletion based on content because they are wrong. So, [enter] > Orlady . . who illustrates a pattern of deleting perfectly valid, legitimate information after attributing the changes to one master banned user. Thanks. (just to state it for the record, I am not linked to this banned person in any way.)