Talk:Teeth (2007 film): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:17, 1 August 2008

Film Start‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

So it looks like the plot summary was plagiarized from http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/film/1504/

How does Wikipedia feel about plagiarism?

Please try and avoid personal attacks on the talk pages. See Wikipedia:Avoid Abuse of Talk Pages and Wikipedia:Good Faith for some good guidelines on proper Wikipedia ettiquette. There are some good guidelines for how to deal with plagiarism as well: Wikipedia:Copywright Infringement and Copywright Problems. We can't permit plagiarism here. However maybe it would be best if someone could take a look at the alledged plagiarism and work to re-write the content? I'm sure this article could be salvaged with some positive co-operative effort. Thanks! 66.17.118.195 14:07, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there's plagiarism going on, but the original source for the text is actually the film's website, so it looks like someone simply cut and pasted in the official film synopsis. I've remedied the trouble spot with a citation and quote marks.
Malinda E. Berry 18:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Dawn&Tobey-Teeth(film).JPG

Image:Dawn&Tobey-Teeth(film).JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 20:34, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trailer

You can see the trailer for this movie HERE. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Slewy (talk • contribs) 22:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Marketing

Should the change in marketing be noted? The first poster presents it as a goofy comedy, wheras the 2nd one presents it as a creepy horror. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.99.199.2 (talk) 22:02, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Teeth (2008)

why is there no article for the new teeth film coming out in 2008? Machete97 (talk) 19:18, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Source? Gwynand | Talk•Contribs 19:24, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trailers on tv and in cinemas, adverts everywhere etc. It doesn't really need them but here's some web sources I just looked up now - [1] (ask.com search results if you want more) [2] [3] [4]

for some reason IMDb doesn't have any info on it either - unless someone else can find it. Machete97 (talk) 18:17, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the image in this article is the exact same image as the one in the trailers, adverts and posters for the 2008 film. Machete97 (talk) 19:04, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the image in the article shows a website at the bottom which says the film is coming out in 2008 Machete97 (talk) 19:12, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is because of the fact that it's the SAME MOVIE.

Revision as of 19:12, 18 June 2008 edit NonNobisSolum (talk \| contribs) 1,484 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:17, 1 August 2008 edit undo 68.3.103.53 (talk) →Teeth (2008) Next edit →
Line 37:		Line 37:

	the image in the article shows a website at the bottom which says the film is coming out in 2008 [[User:Machete97\|Machete97]] ([[User talk:Machete97\|talk]]) 19:12, 18 June 2008 (UTC)		the image in the article shows a website at the bottom which says the film is coming out in 2008 [[User:Machete97\|Machete97]] ([[User talk:Machete97\|talk]]) 19:12, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
			::This is because of the fact that it's the SAME MOVIE.