Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emochila: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:{{la|Emochila}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Emochila|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emochila]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emochila|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 August 4#{{anchorencode:Emochila}}|View log]])</noinclude> |
:{{la|Emochila}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Emochila|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emochila]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emochila|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 August 4#{{anchorencode:Emochila}}|View log]])</noinclude> |
||
Author declined prod. Company that does not provide sources to assert notability. [[User:Rwiggum|<span style="color: #4B5320;">Rwiggum</span>]] (<sup>[[User talk:Rwiggum|<font color="Black"><b>Talk</b></font>]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rwiggum|<font color="Black"><b>Contrib</b></font>]]</sub>) 21:16, 4 August 2008 (UTC) |
Author declined prod. Company that does not provide sources to assert notability. [[User:Rwiggum|<span style="color: #4B5320;">Rwiggum</span>]] (<sup>[[User talk:Rwiggum|<font color="Black"><b>Talk</b></font>]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Rwiggum|<font color="Black"><b>Contrib</b></font>]]</sub>) 21:16, 4 August 2008 (UTC) |
||
I've read this article fully. It contains relevant content, is footnoted with approximately 6 sites, and does not appear to be written maliciously, falsely, or without merit. I don't understand why it would be deleted. The main reason for deletion claims that the company does not provide sources to assert notability. What else could you need? Partnership affiliations from at least 4 major players, and audio at conventions? |
|||
[[User:Cbrubaker|Cbrubaker]] ([[User talk:Cbrubaker|talk]]) 13:54, 5 August 2008 (UTC)cbrubaker |
|||
Revision as of 13:54, 5 August 2008
- Emochila (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Author declined prod. Company that does not provide sources to assert notability. Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 21:16, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
I've read this article fully. It contains relevant content, is footnoted with approximately 6 sites, and does not appear to be written maliciously, falsely, or without merit. I don't understand why it would be deleted. The main reason for deletion claims that the company does not provide sources to assert notability. What else could you need? Partnership affiliations from at least 4 major players, and audio at conventions?
Cbrubaker (talk) 13:54, 5 August 2008 (UTC)cbrubaker