Talk:Sergeant Hathaway: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TelevisionWikiProject}} |
{{TelevisionWikiProject}} |
||
{{British TV shows project}} |
{{British TV shows project}} |
||
{{WikiProject Media franchises}} |
|||
== Life Born of Fire == |
== Life Born of Fire == |
Revision as of 05:32, 6 August 2008
![]() | Television Unassessed | |||||||||
|
Template:British TV shows project
![]() | Media franchises Unassessed | |||||||||
|
Life Born of Fire
I don't agree with a lot of what is written about Hathaway in this article. The fact is, it is interpretation. Especially (perhaps I mean particularly) what has been written about "Life Born of Fire" regarding Hathaway's sexuality.
One particular sentence: "At the end of that episode Hathaway is seen holding a copy of Loaded and a Yorkie bar, with the tongue in cheek implication that Lewis should not concern himself with his sexuality" is quite troublesome to me. When watching this episode I did not feel that this was the implication of the scene. I read it more as an intimation from Hathaway that he was, in fact, straight. The scene was rather a moment of growth in the relationschip between Lewis and Hathaway rather than Hathway telling Lewis that he 'should not concern himself' with his private life.
Anyway, the point is: Does anyone agree with me that this should be reworded/reworked/removed?! Or does anyone have a source in support of the wording? (or compelling argument for it staying the same?)EttaLove (talk) 22:07, 6 July 2008 (UTC)