User talk:Wildhartlivie: Difference between revisions
Mosedschurte (talk | contribs) |
→hi: new section |
||
Line 92: | Line 92: | ||
:You probably do not want to re-enter the craziness of the Milk talk page, but for a laugh, you should go check the history of the Milk article now on adding literally a SINGLE SENTENCE on Milk's support of Jones and a link to the new article.[[User:Mosedschurte|Mosedschurte]] ([[User talk:Mosedschurte|talk]]) 16:39, 6 August 2008 (UTC) |
:You probably do not want to re-enter the craziness of the Milk talk page, but for a laugh, you should go check the history of the Milk article now on adding literally a SINGLE SENTENCE on Milk's support of Jones and a link to the new article.[[User:Mosedschurte|Mosedschurte]] ([[User talk:Mosedschurte|talk]]) 16:39, 6 August 2008 (UTC) |
||
== hi == |
|||
was a mistake. I am a multiple partner in many languages. and at that time was putting images |
|||
that were not used. command him greetings and I apologise |
Revision as of 16:48, 6 August 2008
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3f/Film_reel.svg/50px-Film_reel.svg.png)
Hey, welcome to the Films WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your user page.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
- The project has a monthly newsletter. The newsletter for September has been published. October's issue is currently in production; it will be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.
There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:
- Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
- Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Film Tasks template to see how you can help.
- Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Wikipedia. Check it out!
- Want to collaborate on articles? The Cinema Collaboration of the Week picks an article every week to work on together.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around!
Helpful templates
Just cut an paste them when you need them from this page, I keep them on my user page. The dates are always formatted correctly, just remember to increment the date, as often as possible, as I sometimes forget to do.
- <ref>{{cite web |url= |title= |accessdate=2007-10-31 |quote= |publisher= }}</ref>
- <ref>{{cite book |last= |first= |authorlink= |coauthors= |title= |year= |publisher= |quote= | url= |isbn= }}</ref>
- <ref>{{cite news |first= |last= |authorlink= |coauthors= |title= |url= |quote= |publisher=[[New York Times]] |date= |accessdate=2007-10-31 }}</ref>
Referencing
Thanks. Yes, I wrote it to provide a simple intro for new users, as referencing is essential and the existing pages something of a maze. You can post it on user or article talk pages as {{refstart}} or link to WP:REFB. You might like to watchlist the template and essay talk page to help keep an eye on it. Ty 00:22, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Jim Jones Comment
Hey, Didn't mean to ruffle any feathers. I have no problem with the veracity of Flavor Aid, but I couldn't find reliable sources for it any more than I could for the Kool-Aid. The History Channel video showed that Flavor Aid and Kool-Aid were available in Guyana, and the investigator mentioned "cool-aid" packets. There are no sources cited for Flavor Aid being there, though I do not dispute it. Wouldn't the lack of sources make Flavor Aid the original research? My contention is that in the light of the fact that they had both drink mixes, and investigators said the generic "cool-aid" it is presumptuous, and there is no good reason to assume that they only had Flavor Aid. Thoughts? Leenunes (talk) 02:31, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films July 2008 Newsletter
The July 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:49, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Hag2 request
Hi, Wild... I want to clean my Usertalk. I thought that I would ask you to delete everything of yours first, with the exception of the Reference Guide. I will then delete my own comments. I do not feel that our correspondence is necessary to be kept around as archive material. Thank you. (p.s. you can delete this ASAP.) Hag2 (talk) 15:15, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
novel
So it's called a non-fiction novel, as other books are, but that phrase is a contradiction in terms. Novels are fiction. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.64.190.41 (talk) 07:13, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Sorry for the Insensitivity.
Thank you for correcting me in my insensitive post on the Jonestown issue.
If I had a tail it would be stuck between my legs. since I don't have a tail I can only feet embarrased about my post and continue to remember this admonishment.
Gilda Rules!
Jaxdave
New Messages!
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Marlon Brando
Please ask for page protection on Marlon Brando. There have been 16 attacks in the last 100 edits, over a one month period, by 92.x.x.x. or 16%. There have been 39 (39% of the time) reverts (rv, undid, delete, reverting) in the last 100 edits. Thanks. 207.69.137.35 (talk) 18:35, 5 August 2008 (UTC) (aka Zoro)
Talk:Political Alliances of the People's Temple (copied from Mosedschurte)
I was hoping you'd jump into this discussion. My perspective is that no one will be satisfied until there is no mention of Harvey Milk and Peoples Temple on the same page, but that's probably not entirely fair. I'm not sure what else to say about this. Wildhartlivie (talk) 16:08, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
- I generally agree, except "no one" is really one editor. The Rfc he started demonstrated that his feelings were not that of everyone. In fact, many wanted a fairly extensive section to stay in the Milk article.
- I did jump in the discussion.Mosedschurte (talk) 16:17, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
- You probably do not want to re-enter the craziness of the Milk talk page, but for a laugh, you should go check the history of the Milk article now on adding literally a SINGLE SENTENCE on Milk's support of Jones and a link to the new article.Mosedschurte (talk) 16:39, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
hi
was a mistake. I am a multiple partner in many languages. and at that time was putting images that were not used. command him greetings and I apologise