Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiffany Holiday: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*'''Delete''' and salt. Fails [[WP:N]] amd [[WP:BIO]]. This in spite of such encyclopedic text as "She is known for a big natural breast." One breast? Is the other lesser in size or unnatural in its augmentation? [[User:Edison2|Edison2]] ([[User talk:Edison2|talk]]) 03:49, 24 August 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' and salt. Fails [[WP:N]] amd [[WP:BIO]]. This in spite of such encyclopedic text as "She is known for a big natural breast." One breast? Is the other lesser in size or unnatural in its augmentation? [[User:Edison2|Edison2]] ([[User talk:Edison2|talk]]) 03:49, 24 August 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' Indeed, it does not satisfy [[WP:PORNBIO]]. [[User:Lady Galaxy|<b><font color="000000">Lady</font></b>]] [[User talk:Lady Galaxy|<b><font color="FF1493">Galaxy</font></b>]] 06:33, 24 August 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' Indeed, it does not satisfy [[WP:PORNBIO]]. [[User:Lady Galaxy|<b><font color="000000">Lady</font></b>]] [[User talk:Lady Galaxy|<b><font color="FF1493">Galaxy</font></b>]] 06:33, 24 August 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Strong keep''' - Pass [[WP:PORNBIO]], [[WP:N]] and [[WP:BIO]] - see talk page, 100 scenes, 894,000 hit on Google [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=KE&q=%22Tiffany+Holiday%22&btnG=Search], 36,200 on Google Images [http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&hs=KE&q=%22Tiffany%20Holiday%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi]. Very famous American porn star [http://people.famouswhy.com/tiffany_holiday/]. --[[User:THFFF|THFFF]] ([[User talk:THFFF|talk]]) 07:37, 24 August 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 07:37, 24 August 2008
- Tiffany Holiday (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Porn actress who does not appear to satisfy WP:PORNBIO. Speedily deleted seven times over the past few years, and it doesn't seem that notability has improved. A previous deletion review can be seen here. The article does not assert notability in my view, but the speedy tag was removed and given the history I think its time for an AfD discussion. Accurizer (talk) 02:03, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete and salt the earth. An attempts to recreate this article should have to pass a deletion review, this is getting ridiculous. It is bordering on disruptive. Wikipedia is not a place for promotion.--Crossmr (talk) 02:47, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete and SALT. I definitely wouldn't do her. Oh, and WP:PORNBIO. Ya, that too. Ironholds 03:35, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete and salt. Fails WP:N amd WP:BIO. This in spite of such encyclopedic text as "She is known for a big natural breast." One breast? Is the other lesser in size or unnatural in its augmentation? Edison2 (talk) 03:49, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Indeed, it does not satisfy WP:PORNBIO. Lady Galaxy 06:33, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- Strong keep - Pass WP:PORNBIO, WP:N and WP:BIO - see talk page, 100 scenes, 894,000 hit on Google [1], 36,200 on Google Images [2]. Very famous American porn star [3]. --THFFF (talk) 07:37, 24 August 2008 (UTC)