Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fleam the sword: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
++
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
*'''Delete'''. Plot summary for the fictional sword of a fictional character, obviously non-notable. [[User:Doctorfluffy|Doctorfluffy]] <small>([[User talk:Doctorfluffy|robe and wizard hat]])</small> 02:11, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Plot summary for the fictional sword of a fictional character, obviously non-notable. [[User:Doctorfluffy|Doctorfluffy]] <small>([[User talk:Doctorfluffy|robe and wizard hat]])</small> 02:11, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Merge what exactly of a fictional sword? If there is any important information it should already be in the fictional owner of the sword. If not just add it. "Fleam the sword" reruns 0 GHits. It's an unlikely item as well. No reason to keep it as a redirect. Article right now is orphan as well. It's not even mentioned in the [[List of fictional swords]]! -- [[User:Magioladitis|Magioladitis]] ([[User talk:Magioladitis|talk]]) 00:18, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Merge what exactly of a fictional sword? If there is any important information it should already be in the fictional owner of the sword. If not just add it. "Fleam the sword" reruns 0 GHits. It's an unlikely item as well. No reason to keep it as a redirect. Article right now is orphan as well. It's not even mentioned in the [[List of fictional swords]]! -- [[User:Magioladitis|Magioladitis]] ([[User talk:Magioladitis|talk]]) 00:18, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' as obviously notable. No reason to delete. --[[Special:Contributions/63.3.1.1|63.3.1.1]] ([[User talk:63.3.1.1|talk]]) 05:05, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:05, 26 September 2008

Fleam the sword

Fleam the sword (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This element of fiction does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 22:45, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]