Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fleam the sword: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Magioladitis (talk | contribs) ++ |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*'''Delete'''. Plot summary for the fictional sword of a fictional character, obviously non-notable. [[User:Doctorfluffy|Doctorfluffy]] <small>([[User talk:Doctorfluffy|robe and wizard hat]])</small> 02:11, 25 September 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. Plot summary for the fictional sword of a fictional character, obviously non-notable. [[User:Doctorfluffy|Doctorfluffy]] <small>([[User talk:Doctorfluffy|robe and wizard hat]])</small> 02:11, 25 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''. Merge what exactly of a fictional sword? If there is any important information it should already be in the fictional owner of the sword. If not just add it. "Fleam the sword" reruns 0 GHits. It's an unlikely item as well. No reason to keep it as a redirect. Article right now is orphan as well. It's not even mentioned in the [[List of fictional swords]]! -- [[User:Magioladitis|Magioladitis]] ([[User talk:Magioladitis|talk]]) 00:18, 26 September 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. Merge what exactly of a fictional sword? If there is any important information it should already be in the fictional owner of the sword. If not just add it. "Fleam the sword" reruns 0 GHits. It's an unlikely item as well. No reason to keep it as a redirect. Article right now is orphan as well. It's not even mentioned in the [[List of fictional swords]]! -- [[User:Magioladitis|Magioladitis]] ([[User talk:Magioladitis|talk]]) 00:18, 26 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' as obviously notable. No reason to delete. --[[Special:Contributions/63.3.1.1|63.3.1.1]] ([[User talk:63.3.1.1|talk]]) 05:05, 26 September 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:05, 26 September 2008
Fleam the sword
- Fleam the sword (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This element of fiction does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 22:45, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
- Merge to Rol Cortishane which is itself questionable. Hobit (talk) 00:40, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
- Merge or even delete as it is extremely obscure. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:51, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
- Merge I'd try to get the information merged somewhere in the description of the game play or the character. To delete outright would require some reason why this would not be suitable. That it does not justify a separate article is clear enough. It shuld not be the onus of the defender of content to show why it could be merged, not deleted, but the other way round. DGG (talk) 07:00, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete I was going to say merge into Rol Cortishane, but as that character's article should be merged or deleted as well, I don't want to unnecessarily put off the final decision. – sgeureka t•c 18:49, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Plot summary for the fictional sword of a fictional character, obviously non-notable. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 02:11, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Merge what exactly of a fictional sword? If there is any important information it should already be in the fictional owner of the sword. If not just add it. "Fleam the sword" reruns 0 GHits. It's an unlikely item as well. No reason to keep it as a redirect. Article right now is orphan as well. It's not even mentioned in the List of fictional swords! -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:18, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep as obviously notable. No reason to delete. --63.3.1.1 (talk) 05:05, 26 September 2008 (UTC)