Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peregrine Falcons in popular culture (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:34, 26 September 2008

Peregrine Falcons in popular culture

Wikipedia is not an indiscriminite collection of information. The list here is poorly referenced and most of the items within the list are nonnotable, for example: a fictional character who uses falcoms to murder opponents. Fails general notability requirements: show me one acceptable source discussing this list's topic "Peregrine falcons in popular culture", I highly doubt any exist. Themfromspace (talk) 05:05, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As the nominator said, this is just a list of random items. Steve Dufour (talk) 05:26, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not very confident here: there is an article to be written on the subject (or something like the subject); and this was moved from the peregrine article, where there's now nothing. But what's there really is mostly trivia; and what might be worth keeping is unsourced. I'd say keep and improve. But that's what people said at the last AfD and it's still a bad article. N p holmes (talk) 06:50, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, although a couple of the entries here (like the first two I think) could probably be salvaged. TallNapoleon (talk) 07:05, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, random and should just have been deleted in the first place. Punkmorten (talk) 08:38, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete as per items 1-4, 8, and 10 at WP:LC, as well as that all "in popular culture" articles are, in my opinion, inherently non-notable. Stifle (talk) 11:10, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete Random, arbitrary listcruft. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 12:01, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as useless listcruft. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 12:05, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep as a useful and discriminate collection of information and as all “in popular culture“ articles are inherently notable, but delete this discussion as AfDcruft.--63.3.1.130 (talk) 12:34, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 *'''Strong delete''' Random, arbitrary listcruft. [[User:TenPoundHammer|<span style="color:green">Ten Pound Hammer</span>]] and his otters • <sup>([[Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer|Broken clamshells]] • [[:User talk:TenPoundHammer|Otter chirps]] • [[:User:TenPoundHammer/Country|HELP]])</sup> 12:01, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' as useless listcruft. &ndash;[[User:Juliancolton|Juliancolton]] [[User talk:Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''T'''ropical</sup></font>]] [[Special:contributions/Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''C'''yclone</sup></font>]] 12:05, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
+*'''Strong keep''' as a useful and discriminate collection of information and as all “in popular culture“ articles are inherently notable, but delete this discussion as AfDcruft.--[[Special:Contributions/63.3.1.130|63.3.1.130]] ([[User talk:63.3.1.130|talk]]) 12:34, 26 September 2008 (UTC)