Talk:Unit root: Difference between revisions
The link to characteristic equation isn't making sense. |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The link to [[characteristic equation]] isn't making a lot of sense to me so far. That is an article about characteristics equations of matrices, whose roots are [[eignvalue]]s. Is that what is intended here? It doesn't look like it. [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] ([[User talk:Michael Hardy|talk]]) 22:13, 2 August 2008 (UTC) |
The link to [[characteristic equation]] isn't making a lot of sense to me so far. That is an article about characteristics equations of matrices, whose roots are [[eignvalue]]s. Is that what is intended here? It doesn't look like it. [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] ([[User talk:Michael Hardy|talk]]) 22:13, 2 August 2008 (UTC) |
||
==Audience?== |
|||
The audience for this article is severely limited. I suggest an introduction that targets a broader audience with a more limited understanding of statistics. The article is heavy on statistical jargon and does not make the subject more accessible. I would be interested in others thoughts on this. Perhaps accessibility is not a concern. [[Special:Contributions/206.193.225.70|206.193.225.70]] ([[User talk:206.193.225.70|talk]]) 19:01, 26 September 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:01, 26 September 2008
Statistics Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Economics Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Normally, "a" would be the intercept, and "b" would be the slope. Is it different in this equation for some reason?
- There is not intercept in this equation. Note that this article is still a stub and does not provide full coverage of the subject. Karina.l.k 17:17, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
The link to characteristic equation isn't making a lot of sense to me so far. That is an article about characteristics equations of matrices, whose roots are eignvalues. Is that what is intended here? It doesn't look like it. Michael Hardy (talk) 22:13, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Audience?
The audience for this article is severely limited. I suggest an introduction that targets a broader audience with a more limited understanding of statistics. The article is heavy on statistical jargon and does not make the subject more accessible. I would be interested in others thoughts on this. Perhaps accessibility is not a concern. 206.193.225.70 (talk) 19:01, 26 September 2008 (UTC)