Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorina Pineda: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*'''Delete, or merge''' to [[Bituing Walang Ningning]]. Totally unsourced. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<b><sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup></b>]]'' 03:00, 26 September 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Delete, or merge''' to [[Bituing Walang Ningning]]. Totally unsourced. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<b><sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup></b>]]'' 03:00, 26 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' Not every character is notable, but she's the lead character in a very major series (not that one would guess either from the nomination. The article asserts that this particular role in this particular series was of special importance ''outside the series itself'' , which, if adequately documented, would be enough for notability even for those who don'tt hink that in-fiction notability is possible. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 00:15, 27 September 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' Not every character is notable, but she's the lead character in a very major series (not that one would guess either from the nomination. The article asserts that this particular role in this particular series was of special importance ''outside the series itself'' , which, if adequately documented, would be enough for notability even for those who don'tt hink that in-fiction notability is possible. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 00:15, 27 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Strong keep''' and recommend TTN and Magioladitus actually find and sources for a change.--[[Special:Contributions/63.3.1.2|63.3.1.2]] ([[User talk:63.3.1.2|talk]]) 14:48, 27 September 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:48, 27 September 2008
- Dorina Pineda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This character does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 17:01, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- Strong delete. Not every character in a soap opera is notable. No reliable third party sources, no references, no real world information in general, no nothing. -- Magioladitis (talk) 17:12, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- treelo radda 18:17, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- treelo radda 18:18, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, or merge to Bituing Walang Ningning. Totally unsourced. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 03:00, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Not every character is notable, but she's the lead character in a very major series (not that one would guess either from the nomination. The article asserts that this particular role in this particular series was of special importance outside the series itself , which, if adequately documented, would be enough for notability even for those who don'tt hink that in-fiction notability is possible. DGG (talk) 00:15, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
- Strong keep and recommend TTN and Magioladitus actually find and sources for a change.--63.3.1.2 (talk) 14:48, 27 September 2008 (UTC)