Jump to content

Talk:Exact statistics: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 10: Line 10:
Not sure why we need two articles so similar&mdash;'''''[[User:G716|<font color="Purple">G716</font>]]'''''&nbsp;&lt;[[User talk:G716|<sup>T</sup>]]·[[Special:Contributions/G716|<sub>C</sub>]]&gt; 01:17, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Not sure why we need two articles so similar&mdash;'''''[[User:G716|<font color="Purple">G716</font>]]'''''&nbsp;&lt;[[User talk:G716|<sup>T</sup>]]·[[Special:Contributions/G716|<sub>C</sub>]]&gt; 01:17, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
:The text of the two articles isn't that similar, though they both need work. The topics aren't synonymous—'[[exact statistics]]' is a broader topic than '[[exact test]]' as the former includes exact confidence intervals. Exact tests are a more straightforward topic than exact confidence intervals and usually encountered first so there may be merit in separate articles. So perhaps we could have an article on 'exact tests', one on 'exact confidence intervals', and a shorter one on 'exact statistics' introducing both? --[[User:Qwfp|Qwfp]] ([[User talk:Qwfp|talk]]) 10:54, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
:The text of the two articles isn't that similar, though they both need work. The topics aren't synonymous—'[[exact statistics]]' is a broader topic than '[[exact test]]' as the former includes exact confidence intervals. Exact tests are a more straightforward topic than exact confidence intervals and usually encountered first so there may be merit in separate articles. So perhaps we could have an article on 'exact tests', one on 'exact confidence intervals', and a shorter one on 'exact statistics' introducing both? --[[User:Qwfp|Qwfp]] ([[User talk:Qwfp|talk]]) 10:54, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

:The articles aren't similar, I'm with Qwfp on this one. [[Special:Contributions/98.221.85.188|98.221.85.188]] ([[User talk:98.221.85.188|talk]]) 14:47, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:47, 10 October 2008

WikiProject iconStatistics Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconMathematics Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's priority scale.

Merge proposal

Not sure why we need two articles so similar—G716 <T·C> 01:17, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The text of the two articles isn't that similar, though they both need work. The topics aren't synonymous—'exact statistics' is a broader topic than 'exact test' as the former includes exact confidence intervals. Exact tests are a more straightforward topic than exact confidence intervals and usually encountered first so there may be merit in separate articles. So perhaps we could have an article on 'exact tests', one on 'exact confidence intervals', and a shorter one on 'exact statistics' introducing both? --Qwfp (talk) 10:54, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The articles aren't similar, I'm with Qwfp on this one. 98.221.85.188 (talk) 14:47, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]