Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Gaming Tour: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m cat
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:


*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Deletion|list of video game related deletions]]. [[User:MrKIA11|MrKIA11]] ([[User talk:MrKIA11|talk]]) 13:59, 9 November 2008 (UTC)</small>
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Deletion|list of video game related deletions]]. [[User:MrKIA11|MrKIA11]] ([[User talk:MrKIA11|talk]]) 13:59, 9 November 2008 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete''' Some quick Google sleuthing makes it painfully clear (if the article hadn't accomplished it already) that notability is absent.--[[User:KojiDude|<font color="silver">''Koji''</font>]][[Faith|<font color="gray">†</font>]] 15:13, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
*'''keep''' Some quick Google sleuthing makes it painfully clear (if the article hadn't accomplished it already) that notability is present.--[[User:KojiDude|<font color="silver">''Koji''</font>]][[Faith|<font color="gray">†</font>]] 15:13, 9 November 2008 (UTC)


*'''Keep'''. Considering the proportionality of the 2008 StarCraft tournament, and the number of players participating in it (4k players), not to mention the article existing for a very long time now, it is notable. On a side note, please understand that Google searching is NOT used in debates anymore, just thought I should throw that out there for you Koji.--[[Special:Contributions/4.245.74.32|4.245.74.32]] ([[User talk:4.245.74.32|talk]]) 16:15, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. Considering the proportionality of the 2008 StarCraft tournament, and the number of players participating in it (4k players), not to mention the article existing for a very long time now, it is notable. On a side note, please understand that Google searching is NOT used in debates anymore, just thought I should throw that out there for you Koji.--[[Special:Contributions/4.245.74.32|4.245.74.32]] ([[User talk:4.245.74.32|talk]]) 16:15, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Line 17: Line 17:


*'''Delete'''. No notability asserted in article, nor found with a Google search. It's also pretty obvious that the above keep votes are forum-driven (and wrong, too - not using Google searches for AfDs? What?) [[User:Tanthalas39|<font color="#CC7722" face="Papyrus">'''Tan'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:Tanthalas39|<font color="#21421E" face="Papyrus">39</font>]] 20:27, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. No notability asserted in article, nor found with a Google search. It's also pretty obvious that the above keep votes are forum-driven (and wrong, too - not using Google searches for AfDs? What?) [[User:Tanthalas39|<font color="#CC7722" face="Papyrus">'''Tan'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:Tanthalas39|<font color="#21421E" face="Papyrus">39</font>]] 20:27, 9 November 2008 (UTC)


*'''Save'''. Unless you can say "We don't care about the customer." on the main page, I suggest you keep it.--[[Special:Contributions/4.245.21.242|4.245.21.242]] ([[User talk:4.245.21.242|talk]]) 22:45, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:45, 9 November 2008

International Gaming Tour

International Gaming Tour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Fails Notability. SkyWalker (talk) 13:33, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Considering the proportionality of the 2008 StarCraft tournament, and the number of players participating in it (4k players), not to mention the article existing for a very long time now, it is notable. On a side note, please understand that Google searching is NOT used in debates anymore, just thought I should throw that out there for you Koji.--4.245.74.32 (talk) 16:15, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete — I, too, cannot find any verifiable sources to establish notability of the tour; I get nothing but forums. It doesn't matter if the article has been hiding for years and someone just noticed now – that is not a reason to keep the article (neither is WP:THISNUMBERISHUGE). MuZemike (talk) 17:48, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Keep - I'd like to apologize if the article I spent 2 hours making is not good enough for Wikipedia, several other people will come and make it better however.--xgmx (T | C | D | R) 19:13, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No notability asserted in article, nor found with a Google search. It's also pretty obvious that the above keep votes are forum-driven (and wrong, too - not using Google searches for AfDs? What?) Tan | 39 20:27, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]