Talk:Self-Incrimination Clause: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m cleanup |
→reference for husband-wife privilege: new section |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
If there's one example, I'm wondering about the claims of this article that this is unique to one jurisdiction. [[User:Kim Bruning|Kim Bruning]] 10:50, 16 June 2006 (UTC) |
If there's one example, I'm wondering about the claims of this article that this is unique to one jurisdiction. [[User:Kim Bruning|Kim Bruning]] 10:50, 16 June 2006 (UTC) |
||
== reference for husband-wife privilege == |
|||
the part I added unfortunately red-links, but you can find can find information easily, just [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=en&hs=2JT&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=husband-wife+privilege&spell=1 google husband-wife privilege] |
|||
http://www.answers.com/topic/spousal-privilege |
|||
Revision as of 16:14, 18 November 2008
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Self-Incrimination Clause redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Previous discussions without headers
I'm not sure, since I've only watched tv judges :-P, but IIRC in Germany you also don't need to answer questions that incriminate yourself or a close relative.
If there's one example, I'm wondering about the claims of this article that this is unique to one jurisdiction. Kim Bruning 10:50, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
reference for husband-wife privilege
the part I added unfortunately red-links, but you can find can find information easily, just google husband-wife privilege