User talk:GreenerWorld: Difference between revisions
Ravenswing (talk | contribs) Notification: Speedy deletion nomination of Parentline plus. (TW) |
GreenerWorld (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:Parentline plus|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[ Talk:Parentline plus|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that a copy be emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-spam-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:RGTraynor|'''<span style="background:Blue;color:Cyan"> RGTraynor </span>''']] 19:50, 29 October 2008 (UTC) |
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:Parentline plus|the page that has been nominated for deletion]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[ Talk:Parentline plus|the talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact [[:Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles|one of these admins]] to request that a copy be emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-spam-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:RGTraynor|'''<span style="background:Blue;color:Cyan"> RGTraynor </span>''']] 19:50, 29 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
Hi RGTraynor, |
|||
I haven't logged in for a while so only just got this message. I'd not seen that it had been tagged for speedy deletion again, only improvements, and I had said that I would try and avoid editing it myself in case of any conflict of interest. I've deleted what might possibly be considered "peacock" or "advertising". My counter argument to deletion would be to point out that this is a national charity, featured on the BBC One Show last week, and that far smaller charities are already listed on wikipedia. Any advice about what else to do on the tags gratefully received. |
|||
Thanks |
|||
GW |
|||
Revision as of 14:43, 19 November 2008
Welcome!
Hello, GreenerWorld, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! MidgleyDJ (talk) 12:58, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Parentline plus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. MidgleyDJ (talk) 12:58, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
RE: North West Green Party candidates
Heya GreenerWorld. Thanks for adding the info to North West England. =) doktorb wordsdeeds 18:01, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Parentline plus
A tag has been placed on Parentline plus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. RGTraynor 19:50, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi RGTraynor,
I haven't logged in for a while so only just got this message. I'd not seen that it had been tagged for speedy deletion again, only improvements, and I had said that I would try and avoid editing it myself in case of any conflict of interest. I've deleted what might possibly be considered "peacock" or "advertising". My counter argument to deletion would be to point out that this is a national charity, featured on the BBC One Show last week, and that far smaller charities are already listed on wikipedia. Any advice about what else to do on the tags gratefully received.
Thanks
GW