Jump to content

User talk:1onepuposeaccount: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 44: Line 44:
::::If I said no, then I'd be lying. On the other hand, if I said yes, then you would checkuser, salt, oversight and indef-block the hell outta this account. --[[User:1onepuposeaccount|1onepuposeaccount]] ([[User talk:1onepuposeaccount#top|talk]]) 23:10, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
::::If I said no, then I'd be lying. On the other hand, if I said yes, then you would checkuser, salt, oversight and indef-block the hell outta this account. --[[User:1onepuposeaccount|1onepuposeaccount]] ([[User talk:1onepuposeaccount#top|talk]]) 23:10, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
:::::I'll take that as a yes, then. Taking this to CU. <font face="Trebuchet MS"><b>&mdash; [[User:Neurolysis|neuro]]</b><sup><i>[[User talk:Neurolysis|(talk)]]</i></sup></font> 23:12, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
:::::I'll take that as a yes, then. Taking this to CU. <font face="Trebuchet MS"><b>&mdash; [[User:Neurolysis|neuro]]</b><sup><i>[[User talk:Neurolysis|(talk)]]</i></sup></font> 23:12, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
::::::{{Possible}}, or maybe even {{Likely}} if you include technical evidence. --[[User:1onepuposeaccount|1onepuposeaccount]] ([[User talk:1onepuposeaccount#top|talk]]) 23:15, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
::::::{{Possible}}, or maybe even {{Likely}} if you include technical evidence. But then again {{pixiedust}}--[[User:1onepuposeaccount|1onepuposeaccount]] ([[User talk:1onepuposeaccount#top|talk]]) 23:15, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:16, 23 November 2008

Leave a message--1onepuposeaccount (talk) 22:52, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, 1onepuposeaccount, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ironholds (talk) 22:52, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, by the way; if you're planning on contributing helpfully you might want to request a 'crat change your username; the current one implies nasty things (see WP:SPA)
My single purpose is to expand the encyclopedia --1onepuposeaccount (talk) 22:55, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not saying it isn't, just that it appears a bit iffy. You might want to leave a message to that effect on your userpage to avoid any misunderstandings. Ironholds (talk) 22:57, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User Talk:Fatal!ty

I don't think you have a right to "courtesy blank" Fatal!ty's talk page. I'm going to revert it. Hopefully you aren't a sockpuppet of his. You're account was created close to when Fatal!ty was blocked. Killiondude (talk) 22:55, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't I use the same rationale? --1onepuposeaccount (talk) 22:58, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That killiondude is a sockpuppet? Ironholds (talk) 22:59, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In regards to the right to blank Fatal!ty's user-talk page?--1onepuposeaccount (talk) 23:00, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I messaged Irid about this. If the user did courtesy blank (which he did), I don't see why it should be reverted, but maybe I am missing something. neuro(talk) 23:04, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I thought Irid reverted the blanking was maybe to allow other users to see the indef block on it, and the events surrounding the block. I guess we'll have to wait for Irid's say in this. Killiondude (talk) 23:10, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Username

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and I am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy for the following reason: Your name implies an SPA. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?

I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.

You have several options freely available to you:

Thank you. neuro(talk) 23:06, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DTTR--1onepuposeaccount (talk) 23:06, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I will take that as a no, but you should note that you are de facto not a regular, unless you have another account you would like to tell us about - perhaps Fatal!ty? neuro(talk) 23:08, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also, WP:DTTR is disputed, and is not a policy. neuro(talk) 23:09, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If I said no, then I'd be lying. On the other hand, if I said yes, then you would checkuser, salt, oversight and indef-block the hell outta this account. --1onepuposeaccount (talk) 23:10, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'll take that as a yes, then. Taking this to CU. neuro(talk) 23:12, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Possible, or maybe even  Likely if you include technical evidence. But then again  CheckUser is not magic pixie dust--1onepuposeaccount (talk) 23:15, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]