Jump to content

Talk:Pars pro toto: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Rationale for removal of part about some people ‘maybe’ feeling excluded when referring to the Netherlands as Holland
Line 19: Line 19:
policy? That is, is this article about a "thing" or just defining a term?
policy? That is, is this article about a "thing" or just defining a term?
--[[User:Mcorazao|Mcorazao]] 05:49, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
--[[User:Mcorazao|Mcorazao]] 05:49, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

== Offense about Holland? ==

The article currently states: “Inhabitants of the Netherlands who live in provinces other than North or South Holland may feel excluded when “Holland” is used to describe their country.”. I never heard about this, and find it hard to imagine that it is really so… The phrase ‘may’ could also indicate that it is speculation. I think this phrase should be removed, I’ve gone ahead and done so, but if you disagree, let me know :). [[Special:Contributions/145.97.207.153|145.97.207.153]] ([[User talk:145.97.207.153|talk]]) 22:44, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:44, 2 December 2008

inverse

"America (for the United States)" Is this pars pro toto? As far as I'm concerned, the USA are still a part of America and not the other way around. I don't know what you call this, but I'll remove this in a few days, if I'm not wrong.--Ruben 20:11, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

solved, it is called totum pro parte --C mon 21:00, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is not the United States of America also a pars pro toto as the state of Hawaii forms no part of the American continent? Geographically, the state of Hawaii cannot be one of the 'United States of America'. Perhaps that great federal republic ought to be the United States of America and Polynesia.--jglees

Because America consists out of more than the U.S. (Namely Latin America and Canada) it can't be a pars pro toto. C mon 07:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Yankee"?

Should there be any mention of the fact that people in the American South, as a rule, do not like to be called "Yankees" or "Yanks"? That name, in the United States, is understood to refer to a Northerner, but foreigners often use it indiscriminately to describe anyone of U.S. origin. (I know it's not a strict geographical term, but it's along much the same lines.) Funnyhat 23:02, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dictionary term

Not to be a jerk but doesn't this article violate the "Wikipedia is not a dictionary" policy? That is, is this article about a "thing" or just defining a term? --Mcorazao 05:49, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Offense about Holland?

The article currently states: “Inhabitants of the Netherlands who live in provinces other than North or South Holland may feel excluded when “Holland” is used to describe their country.”. I never heard about this, and find it hard to imagine that it is really so… The phrase ‘may’ could also indicate that it is speculation. I think this phrase should be removed, I’ve gone ahead and done so, but if you disagree, let me know :). 145.97.207.153 (talk) 22:44, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]