Jump to content

Talk:Unsanity: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Semicolons (talk | contribs)
→‎Rixstep: new section
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
Is Rixstep really a reliable source? Some of their articles (such as the big list of bad software) seemed like someone had got angry and decided to take it out on other people. Also remember that they are a software company themselves, and wouldn't want other people's software to look to good.
Is Rixstep really a reliable source? Some of their articles (such as the big list of bad software) seemed like someone had got angry and decided to take it out on other people. Also remember that they are a software company themselves, and wouldn't want other people's software to look to good.
—<nowiki>[</nowiki>'''[[User:Semicolons|<span style="text-decoration:none; color: black;">semicolons</span>]]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki>— 14:51, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
—<nowiki>[</nowiki>'''[[User:Semicolons|<span style="text-decoration:none; color: black;">semicolons</span>]]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki>— 14:51, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

== Blatant Advertising ==
Both this article and the "Haxies" article seem to be pretty shoddy attempts at exploiting the Wikipedia for advertising purposes.

Revision as of 13:32, 6 December 2008

WikiProject iconBusiness Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Rixstep

Is Rixstep really a reliable source? Some of their articles (such as the big list of bad software) seemed like someone had got angry and decided to take it out on other people. Also remember that they are a software company themselves, and wouldn't want other people's software to look to good. —[semicolons]— 14:51, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant Advertising

Both this article and the "Haxies" article seem to be pretty shoddy attempts at exploiting the Wikipedia for advertising purposes.