Talk:Unsanity: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Semicolons (talk | contribs) →Rixstep: new section |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Is Rixstep really a reliable source? Some of their articles (such as the big list of bad software) seemed like someone had got angry and decided to take it out on other people. Also remember that they are a software company themselves, and wouldn't want other people's software to look to good. |
Is Rixstep really a reliable source? Some of their articles (such as the big list of bad software) seemed like someone had got angry and decided to take it out on other people. Also remember that they are a software company themselves, and wouldn't want other people's software to look to good. |
||
—<nowiki>[</nowiki>'''[[User:Semicolons|<span style="text-decoration:none; color: black;">semicolons</span>]]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki>— 14:51, 22 May 2008 (UTC) |
—<nowiki>[</nowiki>'''[[User:Semicolons|<span style="text-decoration:none; color: black;">semicolons</span>]]'''<nowiki>]</nowiki>— 14:51, 22 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Blatant Advertising == |
|||
Both this article and the "Haxies" article seem to be pretty shoddy attempts at exploiting the Wikipedia for advertising purposes. |
Revision as of 13:32, 6 December 2008
Business Stub‑class | ||||||||||
|
Rixstep
Is Rixstep really a reliable source? Some of their articles (such as the big list of bad software) seemed like someone had got angry and decided to take it out on other people. Also remember that they are a software company themselves, and wouldn't want other people's software to look to good. —[semicolons]— 14:51, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Blatant Advertising
Both this article and the "Haxies" article seem to be pretty shoddy attempts at exploiting the Wikipedia for advertising purposes.