Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sumerian Records: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:20, 8 December 2008

Sumerian Records

Blatant advertisment; should be speedy deleted, but CSD G11 was declined; this article was speedied once before, I believe for CSD G11 -- Gmatsuda (talk) 22:20, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I cleaned up the article. The result is a reasonable stub on a small record label that did sign a few mildly notable bands. We're talking about a fairly small niche so we can't expect the label to be that well-known outside of the equally small community of fans. I really can't see any compelling result to delete. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 22:27, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I was leaning toward keep until I really started digging into the acts associated with the label. Of the four of them that actually have articles written, three of them badly fail WP:BAND and should probably be up for AfD themselves. Trusilver 23:10, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
But if it isn't kept, then Redirect to Cuneiform script. Mandsford (talk) 03:05, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - 71.138.125.138 (talk) 03:15, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - Nothing but a blatant advertisment. -- 149.142.220.66 (talk) 22:19, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 *But if it isn't kept, then '''Redirect''' to [[Cuneiform script]].  [[User:Mandsford|Mandsford]] ([[User talk:Mandsford|talk]]) 03:05, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' per nom - [[Special:Contributions/71.138.125.138|71.138.125.138]] ([[User talk:71.138.125.138|talk]]) 03:15, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
-*Delete per nom - Nothing but a blatant advertisment. -- [[Special:Contributions/149.142.220.66|149.142.220.66]] ([[User talk:149.142.220.66|talk]]) 22:19, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' per nom - Nothing but a blatant advertisment. -- [[Special:Contributions/149.142.220.66|149.142.220.66]] ([[User talk:149.142.220.66|talk]]) 22:19, 8 December 2008 (UTC)