User talk:Vivin

Please click here to leave me a new message.

Your shamefull words "pot, kettle, black"

The only reason why I did not revert Sukhdev Singh Babbar yet, is because I could not get time to read your vandalized version. Regarding your comment: pot, kettle, black. - Remember I have never called you "hypocrite" even though.....Also Remember!

• On one hand, you are trying to get Hindu Taliban deleted And on the other, you shamelessly want to support Sikh extremism.
• On One hand hand you want other editors to not to delete the text from the articles without discussion and on the other you do the same vandalism where you could get a chance.

Atleast those editors are better than you who believe in justice, who do not keep bias in their editing. If I opposed Sikh extremism then I did not support Hindu Taliban either.

If other editors have started calling you User: Hkelkar, it is NOT their fault. Maybe ..... --Singh6 (talk) 05:07, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Get your facts straight. I'm not trying to get Hindu Taliban deleted. I haven't even worked on that article other than voting in the AfD. A lot of people post here on my talk page, and if you'll notice I only respond to a few of them. Tinu said that the IP is a sock of Hkelkar. Not me. Jeez. --vi5in^[talk] 17:08, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Oh yeah, calling the cleaned up version "vandalized" is quite rich. --vi5in^[talk] 21:27, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Singh, If you have misunderstood, let me clarify i dont believe Hkelkar == Vivin. I was commenting of the IP sock who commented on this page -- Tinu Cherian - 03:40, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Tinu :) --vi5in^[talk] 04:44, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Hello

Hey Vivin! How are things going on with you? Haven't heard from you in a while. I can see a stream of contributions, so I was wondering what was going on... Anyways, feel free mail me sometime when you're free, it would be talking to you again. Cheers! Arjun G. Menon (talk · mail) 06:51, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Hey Vivin! I got your e-mail that you send from WP - will reply soon. You're right, people do oppose me on WP. (see Talk:Upanishads). I think it's a good idea to cast away an article (i.e. stop editing it) when there is too much opposition to what you are doing. The Malayali article was a fair case as I should have been more familiar with the naming rules of WP. But that was not the case with the Upanishads article. Anyways, happy editing - and keep in touch! Arjun G. Menon (talk · mail) 09:01, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Arjun G. Menon (talk · mail) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Hi there

Please see wp:Ignore all rules and please don't disrupt my constructive edits in the future. thanks, I know I can count on you 68.149.137.181 (talk) 22:41, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Excuse me while I laugh uncontrollably. --vi5in^[talk] 23:12, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

RE:Hi Enzuru

Thanks! Hopefully we can fix up this article. --Enzuru 04:03, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

I give up

I don't know how we can get anywhere with that article, where every single source is not acceptable. Not only that, but they eerily check my talkpage to see what Satanoid says to me and then link to it, I don't even have privacy on this issue. Count me out of this one. --Enzuru 09:28, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

It'd be great if you can get a mediation. And I hope we can both survive through this nutty holiday season. --Enzuru 18:40, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Nair Photo

Dear Sir, Please add photos of a) Mohanlal b) Dr G Madhavan Nair c) Lt. General Satish Nambiar d) KPS Menon e) Vijay Nambiar in Nair. Atleast one or two female also like Kamala das or Shobhana. Please remove AK Gopalan —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.198.97.172 (talk) 14:41, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Reinstating Good Faith

Please can you and roadahead put aside your differences and let us move ahead with the Sikh Extremism project and try and move ahead with this project and try and bring some balance to it. I have noted from past involvement in such disputes you are fair minded like Roadahead, so let us try and create some consensus. Regards.--Sikh-history (talk) 16:32, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I read your message on my page and I think the tact you have adopted is the way forward. The sticking point is the initial definition. You are correct Roadahead may not have wanted it to exist but given Satanoids previous history and overt vandalism of Sikh articles:

It is easy to see why he has this attitude. Now the article is here, my main concern is to maintain some neutrality and use sources with ISBN sources, and use quotes from articles where necessary. The Sikh question as has been presented by Satanoid in the article is too simplistic. It has nothing to do with religion , but to do with politics (Khalistan, water rights, language, culture etc). --Sikh-history (talk) 17:02, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

I agree that there is more of a political tone to Sikh Extremism, but the religious aspect cannot be ignored. I think we can explore this better once we agree on a set of sources. Then we can explore the use of the term within these sources and craft the article that way. --vi5in^[talk] 18:09, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Hey

Jatts aren't the descendents of Scythians, it's only a theory. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sogdianprincess x (talk • contribs) 13:24, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

The theory is very weak. No doubt they are Indo-Aryans but Scythians have left their mark everywhere! They might as well claim Arab, Turk-Mongolian, Persian and Afghan or British ancestry too. Everyone these days claims Scythian herritage, Bulgarians do too. The only rightful owners to Scythian ancestry is Ossetes, Ukrainians and Pashtuns.

)