User talk:Jake Wartenberg

Osiris

Hi Jake, you left a message on my page re vandalism but methinks you mix me up with someone else. Taam (talk) 13:42, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Methinks so too. Jake Wartenberg^talk 13:45, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Hey Jake

Sorry about the YouTube - I plead ignorance. However, if you view "The Money or the Gun Open Titles" on YouTube and check me out on IMD, you will see that I am the accredited film editor on this series, so I know what I'm talking about. Please reinstate my accurate revisions to The Money or the Gun wiki entry.

Darren Jonusas —Preceding unsigned comment added by Djonusas (talk • contribs) 23:12, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Describing anything as "cringeworthy" does not comply with WP:NPOV. Cheers, Jake Wartenberg^talk 23:49, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Well, he performed the song in an ironic manner in order to lambast the advertising industry, but i'm willing to tone down the text if needs be. what say you?

Djonusas (talk) 23:54, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Just try to avoid inserting your personal opinions into the article. You could say "poorly received" if there is a source that you can cite (ie a negative review) Jake Wartenberg^talk 00:07, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

ok thanksDjonusas (talk) 00:14, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

No Problem. I have removed both warnings from your talk page, as it is now clear to me that your edits were made in good faith. Cheers, Jake Wartenberg^talk 00:22, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Account creation tool

Someone, probably you, has requested access to the toolserver account creation tool under this username. Please confirm here that it was you. Stifle (talk) 09:10, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

'Twas me indeed. Thanks, Jake Wartenberg^talk 12:43, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

I seem to have access to the tool now, but don't I also need the "accountcreator" permission? Thanks, Jake Wartenberg^talk 14:37, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

do not delete my page on scout songs

it is perfectly useful imformation there are no grounds for deleteing it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thevelvetvoice? (talk • contribs) 00:45, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

The article needs to be more than useful. Please read WP:FIRST. Cheers, Jake Wartenberg^talk 01:14, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

waht specifically is wrong with it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thevelvetvoice? (talk • contribs) 01:55, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Does not meet WP:NOTE Jake Wartenberg^talk 02:06, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Sorry

I didnt mean to vandalize Yoga. My friend did that to try to kick me off Wikipedia since i usee it all the time. He was just being stupid. Really sorry =( —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.58.33.158 (talk) 01:53, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Your IP is on its last warning, so as long as it does not happen again you should be fine. For purposes of legitimate editing, you may wish to create an account. Jake Wartenberg^talk 02:00, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

American Pie

Seriously guy, why'd you delete my addition to the song's article? It was clearly needed! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.104.73.235 (talk) 15:08, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

No, it was not. Remember that this is an encyclopedia. Also, please add your comments to the bottom of the page. Jake Wartenberg^talk 15:12, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Word Salad article

I left you a note at my page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monado (talk • contribs)

Thanks. Jake Wartenberg^talk 15:21, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Baconian theory talk page

I feel angry about your intervention. If you had waited a couple of minutes you would have seen that I was constructively creating an archive 3 which you have now disrupted. So I'll try again. Please desist from disrupting my editing. (Isnotwen (talk) 18:56, 17 December 2008 (UTC))

In the future, please leave an edit summary so that we vandal fighters know what you are doing. Cheers, Jake Wartenberg^talk 20:00, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

I got the same message, but the user did not have a proper edit summary. Vernon (Versus22) (talk) 20:23, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

External links

Charles Brandt's website

Hoffa Mystery Solved

These links are for the public to gain knowledge into the most recent findings regarding the Jimmy Hoffa case. I believe it is unfair for Stephen J. Anderson to delete information that serves the public's quest for the truth about this case. Any help you can provide in this matter would be appreciated. --Spectre7277 (talk) 04:13, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Err... Are you sure you are talking to the right guy? Jake Wartenberg^talk 04:33, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

RFA

It was my page that I deleted what do you meen it was un contructive?It's Me :) O Yea its me.. Washington95 (talk) 15:59, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

If you want to withdraw the RFA, it is better to do so as outlined in WP:GRFA, however, I have re-blanked the page. Jake Wartenberg^talk 16:05, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Nevermind; the page has been properly deleted now. Jake Wartenberg^talk 16:14, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

hi jake,

hi, m new to wiki espacially to this editing, i don know how to edit n use, i hav been trying, so if u could help me... <—Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikimukund (talk • contribs) 16:18, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Y Message on your talk page. Jake Wartenberg^talk 16:21, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Brightling

Hi You deleted my information on Brightling This is true imformation as my name is Brightling Why do you keep deleting it? --Spongyluke1 (talk) 19:55, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Information must be encyclopedic. See WP:N. Thanks, Jake Wartenberg^talk 20:03, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Music Never Stopped

I did a {hang on} and it was deleted —Preceding unsigned comment added by J04n (talk • contribs) 02:44, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

That's too bad. Why don't you recreate the article in your sandbox, and then recreate the article when you are satisfied that it will not be deleted. Cheers, Jake Wartenberg^talk 02:50, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Yggdra Union

It's ludicrous to assert that correcting a section of a page is vandalism. Vandalism is more akin to say deleting the whole page entirely or inserting random nonsense. Secondly, forums are not a source and so the section I've deleted is eligible for expunging since its backing is grounded in a forum but not any reputable sources. You may want to check the history and discussion pages on the article to see why your edit was actually vandalism.