Jump to content

Talk:Church of Scientology International: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Shutterbug (talk | contribs)
Shutterbug (talk | contribs)
Line 11: Line 11:
==broken links - no sources==
==broken links - no sources==


I put the tags back in. Almost all sources for this article are either broken links (links to non-existent PDF files) or primary sources, or - statistically, out of 28 references only <b>4</b> actually exist[http://kepler.sos.ca.gov/corpdata/ShowAllList?QueryCorpNumber=C1060183][http://www.scientology.org/religion/management/pg003.html][http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:IRS-Recognition-Denmark.pdf] and all <b>4</b> are primary sources. Zero scholar works, zero secondary sources at all. [[User:Shutterbug|Shutterbug]] ([[User talk:Shutterbug|talk]]) 06:12, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
I put the tags back in. Almost all sources for this article are either broken links (links to non-existent PDF files) or primary sources, or - statistically, out of 28 references only <b>4</b> are not broken links exist[http://kepler.sos.ca.gov/corpdata/ShowAllList?QueryCorpNumber=C1060183][http://www.scientology.org/religion/management/pg003.html][http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:IRS-Recognition-Denmark.pdf] and those all <b>4</b> are primary sources. The 24 broken links earlier linked to 24 more primary sources. Zero scholar works, zero secondary sources at all. [[User:Shutterbug|Shutterbug]] ([[User talk:Shutterbug|talk]]) 06:12, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:14, 24 December 2008

WikiProject iconScientology Stub‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

OR issues

This article uses a massive amount of PDF files as references, all of them uploaded and added by the same user. Might be OR. Shutterbug (talk) 22:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that "a massive amount of pdf files were used as references" and which were "added by the same user" is no indication whatsoever for *original research*. Why don't you point out the specific pdf files in question?
I removed your tag. It did not even address the "issue" properly. Cheers. Martin Ottmann (talk) 22:55, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I put the tags back in. Almost all sources for this article are either broken links (links to non-existent PDF files) or primary sources, or - statistically, out of 28 references only 4 are not broken links exist[1][2][3] and those all 4 are primary sources. The 24 broken links earlier linked to 24 more primary sources. Zero scholar works, zero secondary sources at all. Shutterbug (talk) 06:12, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]