User talk:119.224.22.238: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Ceramics: ce |
Ceramics |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Ceramics== |
==Ceramics== |
||
There is no point in duplicating every article in [[:Category:Pottery]] in [[:Category:Ceramics]]. I moved many articles into the ceramics materials & pottery categories, and removed most of the duplication where the articles seemed concerned exclusively with pottery. Some of these might be debatable, but you have reverted many where it clearly is not, so I will revert all or most of your changes. Please produce reasoned arguments for further changes. You might want to read [[WP:OCAT]]. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 02:17, 28 December 2008 (UTC) |
There is no point in duplicating every article in [[:Category:Pottery]] in [[:Category:Ceramics]]. I moved many articles into the ceramics materials & pottery categories, and removed most of the duplication where the articles seemed concerned exclusively with pottery. Some of these might be debatable, but you have reverted many where it clearly is not, so I will revert all or most of your changes. Please produce reasoned arguments for further changes. You might want to read [[WP:OCAT]]. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 02:17, 28 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
:Thank you for the message. I do not understand yur reasoning for your sudden and unilateral changes to long standing categories, my argument for restoration is based on maintaining the status quo until consensus is reached. I would be happy for slimmed down categories but this needs to be by agreement with the community. Therefore I will revert pending discussion ad agreement. Regards. |
|||
Revision as of 06:48, 28 December 2008
Ceramics
There is no point in duplicating every article in Category:Pottery in Category:Ceramics. I moved many articles into the ceramics materials & pottery categories, and removed most of the duplication where the articles seemed concerned exclusively with pottery. Some of these might be debatable, but you have reverted many where it clearly is not, so I will revert all or most of your changes. Please produce reasoned arguments for further changes. You might want to read WP:OCAT. Johnbod (talk) 02:17, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for the message. I do not understand yur reasoning for your sudden and unilateral changes to long standing categories, my argument for restoration is based on maintaining the status quo until consensus is reached. I would be happy for slimmed down categories but this needs to be by agreement with the community. Therefore I will revert pending discussion ad agreement. Regards.