Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/6 pak: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:22, 3 January 2009

WP:NN product bundling. The individual games are very notable, but not the bundle itself. Toddst1 (talk) 15:59, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - It seems to have been covered by sufficient online sites (Google shows 7,500+ results) to merit an article. The bundle was also covered by JS Online here. The article needs revision, but I think the subject is just notable enough. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 17:17, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If it's that important it can be mentioned in the articles for the individual games. StonerDude420 (talk) 18:22, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 [[WP:NN]] product bundling.  The individual games are very notable, but not the bundle itself. [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 15:59, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 *'''Weak keep''' - It seems to have been covered by sufficient online sites (Google shows [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=%226+pak%22+sega+-wikipedia+-ebay+-amazon+-sale&start=10&sa=N 7,500+ results]) to merit an article. The bundle was also covered by JS Online [http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=MWSB&p_theme=mwsb&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EB829A29D41DB55&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM here]. The article needs revision, but I think the subject is just notable enough. [[User:Arbitrarily0|<span style='color:black'><b><u><i><big>A</big>rbitrarily<big>0</big></i></u></b></span>]]&nbsp;<sup><b>([[User talk:Arbitrarily0|<span style="font-variant: small-caps; color:#FF4500;">talk</span>]])</b></sup> 17:17, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
+* '''Delete'''. If it's that important it can be mentioned in the articles for the individual games. [[User:StonerDude420|StonerDude420]] ([[User talk:StonerDude420|talk]]) 18:22, 3 January 2009 (UTC)